English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

After all that CLEARLY POLITICAL timing last week (I mean, come on...the man is hailed by the press as the most powerful evangelical leader in the country, you've been allegedly sleeping with him for three years and you JUST NOW realize who he is...right, and monkeys might fly out of my butt) I bet the accuser is TICKED. All that press and the VOTERS still favor a ban on gay marriage in Colorado...too bad Mark...too bad.

2006-11-09 07:51:54 · 4 answers · asked by mrtoddanson 3 in News & Events Current Events

4 answers

Yeah! Everyone should question the legitimacy of that guy! I think there is "some" truth to what he is saying but he admitted he waited until right before the election to come out about all of it. I mean if he has been sleeping with the guy for so long...you saw how he was dressed and knew he wasn't hurting for money. Did he think he was a unemployed homeless man?

2006-11-09 10:16:40 · answer #1 · answered by Stiletto ♥ 6 · 0 1

Of course the snitch didn't just recently realize who he is. But it's only recently that Haggard - who has admitted now to "sexual immorality" (which, come on, is just a way of avoiding saying, "I'm gay" without lying) and buying meth (though he says that he never took it; riiight) - has had the opportunity to actively politicked for a ban on gay marriage. So, yeah, the guy is totally ticked. I'd be ticked if someone tried to pass a law that said I couldn't marry.

I mean, if I were a drug-dealing hooker and I had the dirt on my drug-buying john, then I probably wouldn't reveal anything, unless I had a really, really good reason to. A good reason like . . . the john decides to back up legislation that would forbid me to get married. Then I guess I'd have to go ahead, risk ridicule, risk revealing myself to the public as a prostitute, as a drug dealer, and as a gay man, and take expose him for being a hypocrite in a bid to save my rights and the rights of those like me.

Yeah. Lot of good it did. It seems that in rejecting Haggard, his congregation and church may have only readied themselves for the ban on gay marriage. At least it shut one powerful hypocrite down.

2006-11-09 12:48:57 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

Being in th closet is a depressing existence. As brazenly gay as i'm now, I bear in innovations as quickly as I first took male hormones and found out my sexuality I had to maintain it a secret at homestead because of the fact i grew to become into afraid my mothers and dads could provide up figuring out to purchase my testosterone treatments. i grew to become into out in each and every component of my existence (college, artwork, buddies) different than at homestead. It drove me loopy.

2016-10-21 13:26:52 · answer #3 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

he is a psycho

2006-11-11 13:44:32 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers