ok..the big bang is not true..the accepted theory is..wen all the elemstns from earth went to outer space and the moon's gravity pulled it ans tthats how the moon was created
2006-11-09 06:46:20
·
answer #1
·
answered by Miss Universe 2
·
0⤊
1⤋
Where was the Big Bang? Right here! How can I say that? Because the Big Bang happened EVERYWHERE in the Universe simultaneously. The Universe was a single point when it was created.
The images you have seen of the explosion radiating out from one location are misleading because the Big Bang *created* space-time. That means it's meaningless to talk about the explosion occurring somewhere and it's also meaningless to ask what came before the BB.
In addition, the expansion of the Universe which results in the red-shift first observed by Edwin Hubble, and which is the apparent result of matter flying outward from an explosion, is not really motion! Rather, it is APPARENT motion caused by the expansion of space itself, everywhere at the same time. Consequently there are distant parts of the Universe that are receding from us at greater than the speed of light -- this is not a violation of Einstein's theory of relativity because it is not true motion, the object are simply carried away by the expansion of space so they do not accelerate in the strict meaning of the word.
2006-11-09 14:53:30
·
answer #2
·
answered by poorcocoboiboi 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
Given that Hypothesis it should. But since we do not know the edges of the Universe we have no place to start. Your theory also assumes the explosion occurred from the center out what if it came from the side like a leaking hose? What if the big bang occured from one universe bumping into another?
Since I wasn't around when it happened.I'm not old enough to answer this question
2006-11-09 14:51:11
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
Yes if the big bang is true then all the mass should still be moving if not just a little bit, knowing this information scientist should be able to pin point the starting site of the explosion
2006-11-09 14:47:58
·
answer #4
·
answered by vipergtsrk578 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
I've always considered the big bang to be a constant explosion in all directions and not a one time event.
Picture a dougnnut. On one side of the doughnut matter and energy flows in. A giant, ultra sized black hole. On the other side, matter explodes outward, (big bang) goes around, and winds up back where it started.
2006-11-09 15:50:32
·
answer #5
·
answered by Ellis26 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
The big bang began everywhere. No matter how small the universe was at the very instant it started it started everywhere. No matter where you measure the velocity of things in the universe, you will always get the same results for expansion
2006-11-09 14:48:06
·
answer #6
·
answered by Gene 7
·
1⤊
0⤋
your correct and you will be happy to know that the center of the universe has been plotted.
you muse be careful thought as there may have been more than one big bang out there just like there is more than one sun. imagine if you were super tiny adn you saw a sun explode, wwould you not think of that as the ceter of the universe not knowing about other suns.
also the 360 degrees you mention may also be effected by other big bangs adn we may not all be heading in the same direction.
also little info on black holes, gueess what keeps our galiexy spinning like it does, yeah a black hole there everywhere just like the planets spin round the sun the solaor systems spin round black holes.
excillent question
2006-11-09 17:33:44
·
answer #7
·
answered by origamix60 3
·
0⤊
1⤋
The books I read say there is not a center. We are the center. Everything is the center, since space is expanding there was no space when the big bang took place, space was created with it. So the center is the Universe itself.
2006-11-09 14:54:45
·
answer #8
·
answered by sable_laser 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
Well, everyone is entitled to their own opinion so I'm going to state mine:
Go back to simple chemistry. You need two substances to create a chain reaction. If you directly compare this to the "big bang", (big bang being a chain reaction of sorts) where did the substances come from in the first place if it created everything we see now? ^.^
2006-11-09 14:48:43
·
answer #9
·
answered by Carlos D 1
·
1⤊
1⤋
Yes look up the super string theory
It suggests that all the universes are inter-connected like bubbles on a vein.
2006-11-09 14:47:54
·
answer #10
·
answered by That GUY 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
Scientist assumed the figure by measuring the rate of expansion of Universe.thhy assumed that at the same rate if Universe starts to shrink then it will become a point in 13.7 billion years.
2006-11-09 14:49:04
·
answer #11
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋