I think - hooray - one more gone - hopefully more and more will be let go now that Bush is going to have to face scrutiny for his grossly illegal acts.
FP
2006-11-09 06:28:59
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋
it is great information! Rumsfeld grew to become into too stubborn and in no way replied nicely to grievance. With a clean face interior the Sec of protection place, it is going to likely be greater basic for the Dems to deal w/him somewhat of Rumsfeld.
2016-12-28 17:17:07
·
answer #2
·
answered by mayne 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
I think its a trap for the democrats. They have been saying they will fix Iraq so then Rumsfeld has been a gigantic problem all along so he gets rid of him puts a new guy in, so that the democrats cant blame rumsfeld for not listening. The new guy is another Bushie close family friend so it really doesnt matter. It just all a trap for the democrats to fail.
2006-11-09 06:30:02
·
answer #3
·
answered by Stephanie is awesome!! 7
·
0⤊
3⤋
It's time to have someone else in the position with some new ideas.
2006-11-09 06:44:39
·
answer #4
·
answered by Sean 7
·
1⤊
0⤋
Did he get fired or resign. Think he'll be collecting unemployment?
2006-11-09 06:30:49
·
answer #5
·
answered by jim 6
·
0⤊
1⤋
"I'm the SecDef. Of course I'm responsible. Good God."
Took him long enough, but now he's OUTTA HERE!
Hit the road, Jack, and don't you come back no more! WOOHOO!
2006-11-13 05:12:04
·
answer #6
·
answered by docextremeways 2
·
0⤊
1⤋
Technically, or to the public, he stepped down. Personally, I think it should have happened long ago.
2006-11-09 06:29:27
·
answer #7
·
answered by mickeyg1958 4
·
1⤊
1⤋
There's another lazy person collecting unemployment on my tax dollars.
2006-11-09 06:31:56
·
answer #8
·
answered by The Teacher 6
·
0⤊
1⤋
It stinks, he was doing a great job in office.
2006-11-09 06:36:05
·
answer #9
·
answered by hawks1322 2
·
1⤊
1⤋
6 months too late.
2006-11-09 06:30:39
·
answer #10
·
answered by ? 7
·
1⤊
1⤋