and do you think Kyoto might be a consideration for the Bush administration.
2006-11-09 05:55:07 · 8 answers · asked by sedition_4_2_0 2 in Politics & Government ➔ Other - Politics & Government
The simple answer is no. Anything that is considered a liberal cause does not stand a chance. The Democrats can propose the legislation, but the president will veto it.
Kyoto is a waste of time. It is not about pollution control or the environment. It is about punishing powerful nations. If the UN is truly interested in the environment they need to craft a treaty which does not exclude two of the world's biggest polluters (India and China). Remember that it is not only the Republicans that wouldn't sign Kyoto, the previous Democrat administration wouldn't sign it either. That should speak volumes about how worthless it really is. We should all be concerned about the environment, but it doesn't mean we should latch onto every piece of garbage that comes down the pipe on the matter. We need commonsense legislation and solutions that are not designed purely to damage our economy while strengthening others by exclusion.
2006-11-09 06:03:50 · answer #1 · answered by Bryan 7 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Hopefully! Kyoto definitely needs to be addressed.
2006-11-09 05:56:51 · answer #2 · answered by harpersr10 2 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Hopefully not. But then, I'm holding out hope that the democrats won't address a variety of issues.
2006-11-09 07:50:01 · answer #3 · answered by Goose&Tonic 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
no Bush will not consider Kyoto because it is unfair to America while letting other nations off scott free
2006-11-09 05:58:32 · answer #4 · answered by TEXAS TREY 3 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Yes. It's about time. Maybe Bush can get pressured again gto deal with something for a change.
2006-11-09 06:15:08 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
McCain is very liberal and believes the government trumps persons. he will mandate variations, and we are able to probable see extra suitable costs, or perhaps undertake some variety of international worldwide warming tax.
2016-10-21 13:18:47 · answer #6 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No. And they probably never will be...addressing the enviroment would mean telling people to change their habits and lifestyle...politicians will not do that.
2006-11-09 06:26:17 · answer #7 · answered by Pete Schwetty 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
hopefully. If the earth blows up all the rich idiot will go along too
2006-11-09 06:19:22 · answer #8 · answered by Taco 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋