Yes! Will you agree with me that a single Sun is giving light to the 9 (or more) planets?!Then , why not?!
2006-11-09 04:59:54
·
answer #1
·
answered by SREE 2
·
0⤊
1⤋
Yes 12 moon signs define exactly of a specific person to person born on any particular date but with difference in time & place. 2 persons born at the same time but in opposite directions of globe will have different fate according to moon rise. However sun signs are general in nature for all the people born in a particular calender month.
2006-11-10 08:02:26
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
No. But you have go deeper in this. Sometimes the detailed Janma Kundalis or Horoscopes will be able to tell something about the person (about 25% at least). But just 12 sun signs can't deifne anything.
2006-11-09 13:08:30
·
answer #3
·
answered by OnlineGandhi 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
no because there is more than the sun sign. the moon sign, venus sign, mars sign etc. its impossible for 6 billion people to have all 12 different signs in them be exactly the same.
2006-11-09 17:11:42
·
answer #4
·
answered by chica™ 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
You need to look at your other planets, not just the sun sign, which is "the sign" everyone refers to. I've studied astrology for 20 years and it works, but you can't only rely on your sun sign. Other highly influential planets are your venus sign and mars sign.
2006-11-09 13:42:23
·
answer #5
·
answered by Julia D 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
actually they just predict what is in future in your life and do not create your future. you have to go in details.
2006-11-11 23:57:34
·
answer #6
·
answered by Mysterious 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
Moon's influence
One cannot deny that moon's gravitational force, which moves billions of gallons of water in the oceans producing high and low tides, could have some effect on the human systems, that are filled with water to the brim! Even our hard bones are 65 per cent water! Studies have shown how elective surgery, done on the new moon day vis-a-vis full moon day, results in marked difference in blood loss. So the cosmos, of which man is but a tiny part, will certainly have a say in his life. I understand what our intellectuals are talking about. The inaccuracies in predicting the future using astrology is the Achilles' heel of astrology. But that is the curse even of science of the highest order, physics as well, not to speak of the ``doctors predicting the unpredictable'' everyday.
My friend's daughter got married just this afternoon. He had promised his late wife on her deathbed that he would have the wedding in a gala pandal outside our village temple in Hariadka. We did have very heavy pre-monsoon showers for the last one-week. Open-air pandal could ruin the whole wedding when it rains. We all prayed very hard that it should not rain during the day and went ahead. It was beautiful sunshine all the way and the wedding was a run away success, despite the weatherman proclaiming to the world that it would rain very heavily in this part this whole day! Edward Lorenz was not an astrologer. He was a scientist of the highest order and a professor at Berkeley. What happened in Hiriadka was Edward Lorenz's ``Butterfly Effect''.
This happens in astrology as well, maybe more frequently, as many of our astrologers have not been to any university. We could improve the situation by having astrology as a subject for scientific scrutiny. While we glorify Isaac Newton as a great physicist, even though his Laws of Deterministic Predictability had been found wanting in the light of Einstein's Theory of Relativity, we rarely tell the world that Newton was, in fact, a practising astrologer!
``The fault, dear Brutus, is not in our stars, but in ourselves.''
- William Shakespeare
No scientist, worth his salt, could predict the earthquakes in Kobe, San Fransisco, or nearer home in Gujarat. The fault in predicting the future is not in physics or astrology but in us. The dynamic Universe does not follow linear mathematical rules for time evolution, but we scientists do, resulting in unpredictability of the future. Our sciences will have to progress to understand the working of Nature better to predict the future accurately. Fault, my friends, is not in astrology or physics but in our methods. Let us study astrology in greater depth and then accept or condemn it. Prejudging anything is unscientific.
American practice
For the satisfaction of our western-oriented intellectuals, I quote here the practice in many American universities of having even paranormal research in their departments. The American Parapsychology Association is a respected member of the American Association for the Advancement of Science. Many of the leading universities there, including the University of California in Davis, have professors of parapsychology and they grant Ph.D.s in that subject. In what way is astrology worse than that? Now that we realise what the Americans do, we could allow our universities to have astrology departments. Astrology is very secular; followers of most religions have faith in astrology.
Confirmed scientifically
What is faith? Faith is what keeps you going when all that you have studied in science and technology fails you you in your hour of peril and when you are in the dumps. ``When the stars are out in the sky and candles burn out in the church, let us burn the coal in our hearts to see us through.'' The power of ``prayer'', confirmed scientifically by many scientific controlled studies in America, could heal.
Faith in God, as seen in many of the religions, keeps one out of danger of severe depression and suicide when frustrated. The God concept and faith in God have saved more lives than all the hi- tech stuff that we boast about put together. Incidentally severe depression, mostly resulting from frustration, arising out of the monetary economy, is scientifically proven to be the main risk factor for killer diseases like heart attacks and cancer. The two leading epidemics of West are suicide (all are depressives) and divorce. We live in a lawful universe without any occult powers. Einstein made a very famous remark in this context: ``Raffiniert ist der Herr Gott, aber boshaft ist er nicht'' (God is subtle, but He is not malicious).
2006-11-10 06:55:11
·
answer #7
·
answered by veerabhadrasarma m 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
No, this all is only believed ly superstitious people.
All this is madness.
2006-11-10 03:33:57
·
answer #8
·
answered by Sonam Singh 2
·
1⤊
0⤋
Yesss, you bet your best-looking dollar they can, in more ways than "one."
2006-11-09 13:57:26
·
answer #9
·
answered by romaniascott 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
no
2006-11-10 09:56:06
·
answer #10
·
answered by mr. x 5
·
0⤊
0⤋