2006-11-09 04:30:08 · 15 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Hillary hasn't led anything, at least not anything honorable.
She led the Bill's Bimbo Brigade to clamp down on reportings of Bill's adulterous meanderings.
She led the legal team that created the documents that let all those land scams occur (for which people were convicted and imprisoned) in Arkansas.
She led that illegal and highly suspect group that tried to create a forced national health system, which included laws to arrest doctors who treated patients privately. Sounds a bit fascist to me!
She 'blew the whistle' on the White House Travel Office for conducting an honest and scandal free business. False allegations levelled against them, bringing them up for FBI investigation, just so her she could install her friends (and campaign backers) as the travel operators. Such a nice gal!
She's corrupt (can you say 'cattle futures', 'whitewater', 'rose law firm billing records', etc?). She lies (vast right wing conspiracy). She's a hell bent socialist - (see health care system notes). And she's never taken any responsibility for her actions.
Bush has led the free world for nearly 6 years now, was governor of Texas, ran a business, etc. He's done a good job and has always held himself accountable for his actions. The GOP has also held him accountable for his actions.
Bush, by a country mile. It's the only logical answer.
2006-11-09 04:47:39 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
Hillary
2006-11-09 16:01:04 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Hillary
2006-11-09 12:33:03 · answer #3 · answered by brian2412 7 · 3⤊ 3⤋
Bush of course. Hillary can't wait to implement Hillary care. So much for choice.
2006-11-09 12:33:18 · answer #4 · answered by Fly Boy 4 · 0⤊ 2⤋
Clinton hands down. Clinton is a sterling performer and well liked by her base and her state. Bush has demonstrated his arrogance, unwillingness to compromise, and hipocracy so clearly that there is no doubt whatsoever he is not even in the same class as Clinton.
2006-11-09 12:42:22 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Bush
2006-11-09 12:31:10 · answer #6 · answered by kapute2 5 · 4⤊ 3⤋
I would love to see how Hillary would have reacted to 9-11.
probably would have surrendered to every terrorist.
2006-11-09 12:45:06 · answer #7 · answered by ace 6 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Bush without a doubt!
2006-11-09 12:31:22 · answer #8 · answered by Starla_C 7 · 3⤊ 3⤋
Bush. He has standards, morals, and ethics, and he stands behind them no matter what the latest poll says.
Hillary is just another Democrat that sways with the breeze trying to be everything to everyone. That is not a leadership quality.
2006-11-09 12:31:00 · answer #9 · answered by MelBright 4 · 4⤊ 4⤋
Neither. They're both lifelong politicians AKA worthless manipulative piles of sh*t.
2006-11-09 12:57:04 · answer #10 · answered by Mr. Bojangles 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋