The question we should be asking is this. Given that anybody allowed as close to Bush as Haggard has been is thoroughly investigated and researched by at least two agencies (CIA and SS), how can anybody pretend that they missed 4 years of drug sodden sex with a male prostitute.
There is no way Bush could not have known. Just like his father saying he was "out of the loop" when Ollie North sold military arms to Iran.
You can only play the "bad information" card so many times.
Now, Bush wants to replace Rummy with one of his father's appointees from the CIA, the same CIA that he says is to blame for "bad information" which caused him to start a war in Iraq.
None of it is really funny, is it?
2006-11-09 04:15:14
·
answer #1
·
answered by Gaspode 7
·
2⤊
1⤋
i would not comprehend Ted Haggard if I stumbled over him in an empty field with a Ted Haggard sign with a image identity tied around his neck. regardless of the shown fact that, those scandal-mongers must be de-frocked or despite it is asserted as for good. If he repents, he can stay as area of the church, yet not greater ministry.
2016-12-28 17:05:27
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Good Repuglicans stick together like birds of a feather.
2006-11-09 04:19:46
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
1⤋
I don't forsee Haggard having any power within the Republican Party ever again. and Foley is gay, I thought they were a protected class, no?
2006-11-09 04:05:40
·
answer #4
·
answered by kapute2 5
·
2⤊
1⤋
How do you know he can keep away from minors. He just hasn't been caught. Ted & Mark would be a good butt pirate couple, though. Maybe Bush will change his stance on gay marriage so they can wed.
2006-11-09 04:09:44
·
answer #5
·
answered by jim 6
·
2⤊
2⤋
Nah. The Democrat party along with perverts that love the Dems.
2006-11-09 04:09:27
·
answer #6
·
answered by Fly Boy 4
·
2⤊
2⤋
No, he's going to take the deceased Gary Studds seat in Mass.Don't know who that is?Google him you 'll be surprised he's a very interesting man.
2006-11-09 04:11:25
·
answer #7
·
answered by Dr. NG 7
·
3⤊
0⤋
OK, why do liberals make a big deal about the republican sickos when they are the party that supports perverted things all the time?
2006-11-09 04:07:52
·
answer #8
·
answered by tcreede 2
·
2⤊
3⤋
Goes to show the moral majority is neither moral nor in the majority.
2006-11-09 04:06:04
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
2⤋
When did NAMBLA join the GOP?
2006-11-09 04:04:58
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
1⤋