There are various personality, temper, IQ, emotional intelligence, social intelligence, locus of control, self esteem, social perception, projective tests (analysis from drawings, writing, seeing pictures etc) and other tests that may disclose traits on an individual's personality and character.
Although these tests require psychological and statistical validation, they can reveal valuable information about an individual. It is important to understand that a single test will not tell you everything about that person, and it can not be perfectly true or valid for that person. The answers you give can be influenced by your mood, whether you got enough sleep, whether you're in a hurry, or even socially desirable answers (giving answers that will make you 'look good', but don't necessarily characterize you). When a person is psychologically tested for whatever trait or aspect, a "battery of tests" needs to be used. That means, for a full personality profile, you will have to take something around 5 to 20 tests that will reveal things about your personality. After taking all those tests, your most important personality traits will show, and this will offer a more accurate description of you.
To name some of the tests you can use for psychological testing (although most of them cannot be found on the internet due to the complexity of the evaluation):
- The 16 Factor Personality Test
- Myers-Briggs Test
- Wechsler Memory scale and Wechsler adult intelligence scale
- Thematic Apperception Test
- Rorschach Inkblot test
- Eysenk personality questionnaire
The projective tests require special education for a psychologist to interpret, and besides the Rorschach test you will find:
- The tree test
- The family test
- The draw-a-human test
- Writing test (graphology)
- The pictures test and others.
2006-11-09 03:12:22
·
answer #1
·
answered by LoreCore 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
It is like a gift. You can either judge a personality/character or you can't. Even very intelligent people can be conned by some and there are those who aren't the sharpest tools in the shed but they can still avoid a bad person like a plauge. It is not something you can learn, this is someting you are able to do. Books, psychologists and the likes are not able to give an accurate judgement on somebody. Bodylanguage is not always good either. Eyecontact is a favourite: many people say that just because somebody isn't looking you in the eye they are lying. What a bullsh! If you are really being sincere you would look at one point in the air and look at that while you are saying what you want.
2006-11-09 03:06:15
·
answer #2
·
answered by Luvfactory 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
Judgement of personality is a very complex matter: indeed the topic of personality is a major part of the whole of psychology.
In very broad terms, and for instance:-
1. There are psychometric tests of personality (certain firms make large amounts of money out of them!). These use questionnaires which people with different personalities - for instance more or less outgoing, more or less anxious - answer in different ways. The adminstartion and interpretation of these tests is a skilled task.
2. There are "projective techniques" which seek to interpret
people's personality from the informal responses they give to things like a (specially designed) set of pictures.
3. We can assess people's personality in interviews - employers and managers are doing this all the time!
4. We can analyse factual information about the person, for instance what sort of leisure interests they go in for.
5. As we learn more about the brain, possibilities are emerging for identifying how personality relates to patterns of activity in the brain.
It is worth mentioning that it is part of human nature that we evaluate people the whole time. Some of the criteria people use for judging human nature are not very good - for instance we tend to relate personality to looks. People's natural deficiensices in judging personality are perhaps the reason why some dubious psychological techniques for this purpose have been developed. One example is graphology, the idea that people's personality can be assessed from their handwriting. Whilst there is considerable belief in graphology in some overseas countries (e.g. hand written job applications are analysed), opinion in the United Kingdom has been that there is little scientific evidence that graphology works.
In general "character" is perhaps loosely another term for personality. However, in relation to employment or law it may be understood to mean the likelihood that the person will commit a crime (e.g. streal from an employer). Clearly there are differences in this respect - for instance people who have committed one crime may be more likely to commit another (although our general approach to the employment of people with criminal records appears to be more motivated by political considerations and the prejudices of those in power than scientific evidence), and men commit more crimes than women. However, in this country there is as far as I know little use of psychological techniques to assess character in this sense. I do not think there are acceptable psychological tools for this purpose, and even if there were their use would be ethically dubious.
2006-11-09 03:31:45
·
answer #3
·
answered by Philosophical Fred 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Observation is the only way, just like you would observe a strange unknown animal in the wild. Some people have a gift of judging character and personalitys, but if thats not you then stay with above.
2006-11-09 03:06:53
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Being a grasp of pulling images is simple with the aid of Realistic Pencil Portrait Mastery guide from here https://tr.im/zOXVP .
With Realistic Pencil Portrait Mastery guide you'll got that called Session Brain Maps and each of the training includes what're named “Process” or “Mind” maps. They are basically outline summaries of the thing that was protected in each of the lessons.
With Realistic Pencil Portrait Mastery you will also get 100 Large Resolution Reference Photographs because if you are likely to exercise your face drawing, you then are going to need guide pictures. That advantage involves 100 top quality dark and bright photographs comprised of 70 looks and 30 face features. Really practical!
2016-04-29 21:27:11
·
answer #5
·
answered by ? 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
I think the best way is to read the body language. Watch the eyes. If they can't look at you, they're probably not telling the truth. The same goes for touching the face, especially the nose or hands across the mouth. If people hold eye contact for too long (and you'll know because it makes you uncomfortable) they're trying to make you believe what they say.
2006-11-09 02:59:37
·
answer #6
·
answered by L J 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
there are techniques of evaluating people .. you can find them in books and websites .. however i dont think all of it is true ... infact most of them cannot be applied in pratical life situations ... i have strong intuitive powers which helps me decide if someone is genuine or fake .. if you are someone over a period of time you should be able to figure it out .. then again we live and learn and we learn to judge people from our past experiences ..
2006-11-09 02:54:01
·
answer #7
·
answered by edifiz 3
·
0⤊
1⤋
in case you think of approximately it, isn't everyones first judgement seems? I recommend you seem at a guy or woman and sweetness whether they're approachable, thats a judgement. yet judging in the event that they seem to be a variety and stable guy or woman or no longer after that initail prejudgement, particular, I take it sluggish to get to comprehend them and their character. I recommend i comprehend all human beings will % to declare character, yet with a view to speak to somebody you seem at that guy or woman first and choose in the event that they appear like they're okay to speak to and get to comprehend. Does that make any sense?
2016-10-21 13:03:06
·
answer #8
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
theres a personality test done by someone called meredith belbin? its called the belbin self perception inventory.its based on team roles but its a good personality one as well.also did one called the flag test which is more personality as well,also schutz, who developed the firo-b fundamental interpersonal relations orientation-behaviour, sorry ant got no links, but check em out.
2006-11-09 03:39:12
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Try evaluating them based on your own values and beliefs. I tend to go with my gut when meeting someone new.
2006-11-09 02:59:44
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋