Yesterday I completed my project on this issue and I believe that they shouldn't. I want to know what other people think.
2006-11-09 01:48:11 · 22 answers · asked by sweet at heart 1 in Politics & Government ➔ Law & Ethics
After we castrate them and remove a few digits, like toes.
Eww. That's gross. Sorry.
They should get radio collars and antennas. Maybe a chip in the wahoo.
2006-11-09 02:05:09 · answer #1 · answered by Em E 4 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Absolutely not in my opinion . Once they reach the status of sexual predator they have exhibited there selves as repeat offenders and the public should not be put at further risks by releasing such inhuman garbage back into society ever !
2006-11-09 01:53:15 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 1⤋
I agree with you. I think they should be confined to some underground dwelling, just keep shoving them down the hole and don't ever let any of them out! Let them play the hunter and the hunted for the rest of their lives with other head cases. I think it has been proven that they cannot be successfully rehabilitated and put back into society. And there has been a very high price paid by many families when they let these "cured" monsters out.
2006-11-09 01:54:04 · answer #3 · answered by his temptress 5 · 1⤊ 1⤋
it depends on a lot of factors. the heavy duty ones like rape, etc. should not be released. i think a 25 year should be mandatory. in other cases like a teacher touching a 16 year old on the first offense, may 1 year probation, etc. there is a very wide range of these crimes. you can't keep everybody locked up for life, they would need 10,000 more jails, lol...
2006-11-09 03:15:38 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
i think they should stay in prison!! Why release them? They can get all the sex they want IN prison with their 'sister' predators. Leave it up to the ACLU to release em tho. As long as they get re-located to homes NEAR those ACLU morons! THEN Id agree with that!!!
2006-11-09 01:56:13 · answer #5 · answered by racingdiego@sbcglobal.net 5 · 0⤊ 1⤋
They should ONLY be released into a psychiatric treatment center. There is obviously something wrong with them for them to commit a crime of a sexual nature.
2006-11-09 01:58:15 · answer #6 · answered by startwinkle05 6 · 0⤊ 1⤋
i don't think they should get the chance to even come out of prison .if i have to pay more to keep their sickness in then i think it is ok because i would like to know that my child is safe from someone that is known to do harm.
2006-11-09 02:57:30 · answer #7 · answered by strawberry36445 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I dont think they should either...but unfortunately if they did there time they have to be let go cause they been held accountable...Regardless I dont think they should be let go with out being monitor for the rest of there life...and hope one day something like this will be put in place...
2006-11-09 01:50:54 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
LIFE SENTENCE! Once that line is crossed that is it, they should be given life. If one can go so far as to molest a child, there should be no more life other than to be locked away from society for good.
2006-11-09 02:06:27 · answer #9 · answered by ? 7 · 0⤊ 1⤋
sexual predators shouldnt be in prison either. they should all, without exception, be put to death and thrown to the scavengers.
2006-11-09 01:50:27 · answer #10 · answered by fn_49@hotmail.com 4 · 3⤊ 1⤋