He spent his political capital and America got the change.
2006-11-09 01:45:40 · 11 answers · asked by bruxho 3 in Politics & Government ➔ Elections
Who will the Dems blame for not getting anything done when they are up for re-election??? You guys just spend our taxes on $100,000 toilet seats.
2006-11-09 01:50:18 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 4⤋
Political narratives utilising advertising strategies to win elections and impression the lots.... Get adequate ppl to believe Bush replaced into the villain, then Obama can blame his mess united stateson Bush and declare credit for successes. And it is a tactic used via the two political events. If we weren't such sheep in our balloting practices, Obama could've under no circumstances been president. according to risk Bush does not have been the two. Oh, properly.... what would be would be.
2016-12-14 04:14:59 · answer #2 · answered by kull 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
He will probably blame the people who were the heads of the national republican election committee like Mrs. Dole or possibly Rumsfeld since Rumsfeld resigned/got fired.
Bush had a good idea the Republicans were going to lose even though he emphatically stated that the Republicans would win both the House and Senate (makes me think he did the same thing with the Iraq War).
If you noticed, he only went to Republican strongholds that ALWAYS voted Republican. If he went to the more moderate areas he risked hurting the Republican candidates campaign instead of helping it. So he went to the Republican strongholds like Indiana and Kansas and raised money in those places to send to the Republican candidates in the moderate states.
To be honest, I don't think he can really blame anybody since his party will be no longer in power. All he can do is accept his party's defeat and somewhat attempt to be bi-partisan. Although I think that will be hard for him to do with as bull-headed as he has been in the past.
2006-11-09 02:01:24 · answer #3 · answered by devilishblueyes 7 · 3⤊ 0⤋
Bush and his inner circle already blamed Rums-fled.
Only because Rummy-the-runner was the most criticized and the Iraqi occupation is so visible.
As this focus continues, I'm sure he'll find another Re-puke target.
It goes without saying that he will begin to point a finger at Dems as soon as, well.........today.
I'm sure he will say Dems support for the war is the main reason he attacked Iraq
2006-11-09 02:12:16 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 0⤋
Bush himself is the most hatred person of this century....he himself has a charge of being killing innocent people...he can not blame anyone....if he is losing in elections this is nothing he deserve some big punishment bigger then Saddam ...for sure
2006-11-09 01:55:47 · answer #5 · answered by shahzebb 3 · 5⤊ 0⤋
This is a tough question. No, I can't predict who will be blamed by Bullshit for this one.
2006-11-09 02:01:05 · answer #6 · answered by Avner Eliyahu R 6 · 3⤊ 0⤋
Whatever Bush bashing is old can't people show a dick some respect for a change or what? Let's see you jump in the Oval office I'd love to rip you to shreds to because I bet you couldn't do any better of a job than Bush is doing!! You'd probably scratch your @ss and pick your nose trying to figure it out.
2006-11-09 01:54:11 · answer #7 · answered by MOVING 5 · 0⤊ 6⤋
Who cares. They are all crooks so glad they are on their way out and that one is gone for sure. Good riddance.
2006-11-09 01:49:59 · answer #8 · answered by Daniella 2 · 4⤊ 1⤋
blame Cheney...He already shot one friend in the face. why not the whole party.
2006-11-09 01:48:21 · answer #9 · answered by devilduck74 3 · 2⤊ 1⤋
I don't believe there is A fall guy, I believe it's republican themselves.....anal retentive...
2006-11-09 01:48:13 · answer #10 · answered by Lipstick 6 · 2⤊ 1⤋