Will there be change in attitude towards Iran and N.Korea, in case, the Democratic Party come to power in USA?

Answer 1

There won't be any significant change in the foreign policy of the US government with change of guard in the White house. Its nuclear policy is directly linked with its obsession of world dominance against the background of the two World Wars. But with the fast changing world they have to be more realistic and rise to the occasion, otherwise their domestic problems will get more complicated.

Answer 2

Their attitude has always been the communists in Russia and China are their friends, and the communist respond by trying to stop Bush's diplomatic efforts everywhere they can, and are only making the world a more dangerous place. They are AIDING the ENEMY, bottom line, people who want to destroy, surpress or overthrow your own country, constitution and freedoms, are NOT your friends. Democrats will give in to any nation that demands concessions, that is the way they get our money and technology, we get their spit and ridicule, and attacks. As Reagan said, "no one ever attacked the United States because they thought that militarily we were too strong." Explain why Clinton did away with our civil defense shelters, our nuclear fallout supplies and equipment, when after giving all that money to Russia they are building the world's largest underground complex at Yamantau while we mothballed Cheyenne Mountain and the Greenbrier complex? The communists and Pakistan's Dr. Khan are helping nations develope nuclear weapons and missiles that may very well be bringing mushroom clouds to a city near you someday, and we are supposed to be ambivalent about this? Yes we have a bigger arsenal, but you don't see us using them, do you? And yes we did end WW2 that way, but only because we barely developed the bomb ahead of Nazi Germany and the Japanese, we didn't understand the residual effects of radiation back then, but more died in the firebombing of cities under LeMay, it was Hirohito who was ready to sacrifice very last citizen for his power. Our invasion forces expected a 90% casualty rate, it was not a war we wanted or started, but like most others we finished it. And in Europe anyways you can buy face cream made with collagen harvested from executed Chinese prisoners today, these are the people Nancy Pelosi hangs out with. If Tippacanoe-and-rabbit-too Carter had done a better job in 1979, (any job?) we wouldn't be facing the challenge we have in Iran today. But then failure to support Shek lead to Communist takeover in China, the Korean and Vietnam Wars and may yet be one over Taiwan, even if not a direct US-China fight. North Korea could be dealt with simply by cutting trade with China unless they shorten the leash on their mad dog.Iran vows the destruction of Isreal and sees their destiny as ruling the WORLD, not just the ancient Persian Empire, and wants not just nuclear weapons but the missiles to carry them around the world. What attitude should we have? Surrender?

Answer 3

I agree. If it isn't done honest i am going to go away the party likely for solid. it doesn't count number if my determination is most appropriate or the different human being. that is about the yank people's voices being heard. I despatched am digital mail to the DNC telling them how i think. I recommend others do an similar. do not purely sit down in this board and *****, take action. edited: If McCain wasn't for the warfare, i might want to haven't any difficulty balloting for him. This warfare is hurting u.s. far more effective than something both of the democrats can do. also it take a majority congress to bypass any guidelines besides. The president purely has veto potential which could be overruled by a 2/3 majority. with somewhat of luck the Senators will study the costs previous to balloting on them.

Answer 4

Iran and North Korea will probably become more aggressive because they fail to realize that the foreign policy is set by the Executive Branch, not the legislative.

They are expecting repeats of Carter and Clinton, who were pretty lassaiz faire when it came to international relations.

Iran has already opened talks with Russia about advancing their nuclear program. And Russia is asking the UN to back down. North Korea had agreed to the multi-lateral talks and on Monday they expressed reservations about it.

Expect to see them push a little harder to test the country's resolve.

Answer 5

The Democrats were too passive with them in the past. What makes you think they'dd do anything different? North Korea and Iran got a "free ride" with nuclear weapons under President Clinton. He was too chickin-$#@* to really "flex his muscles" with them in order to appease them. Stroking on too many interns, I guess.

Answer 6

Yes, there attitude will be one of appeasement. Much like the attitude under the Clinton Admin.

Answer 7

Too passive won't work but there will be more moderation as time goes on and money bills flow to the House.

Answer 8

probably not much difference. they still have to show the same international supremacy they always have. still can't let N. Korea and Iran display themselves publicly if you know what I mean.

Answer 9

Yes. I think both sides will back off a little & not be as confrontational.