If an man of 40+ lived down your street and police raided his house and found images of Peter Pan drawn all over the walls, secret little rooms where he slept with young boys and everytime the man went out he covered his children's heads and even dangled one over a balcony would you think that was ok?
Also, this same man admitted to sharing a bed with other people's children seeing nothing wrong with it and also claimed that he is Peter Pan.
I know MJ has had a strange life and in some ways I feel sorry for him. He's messed up and it's not really his fault. BUT, I suppose what I'm asking is, why do all you MJ fans defend him so much when he has plainly behaved very poorly and made some massively dodgy decisions when you wouldn't be so forgiving of any other grown man? He is, afterall, responsible for his own actions and, in my humble opinion, needs help and not your blind devotion.
2006-11-08
23:20:33
·
21 answers
·
asked by
Anonymous
in
Entertainment & Music
➔ Celebrities
Puppy Power you prove my case very well. I never mentioned his trials. Blind devotion and ignorance of the facts (and still I mean about the man and not any court case) isn't good for anyone.
2006-11-08
23:42:22 ·
update #1
alnzack. I don't hate MJ. You are just the sort of fan I'm asking this to though. In my opinion, you've just done yourself and MJ no favours . All positive comments that you wouldn't afford to another grown man who's done the thing he has and no admitting that he's bahaved badly or even had any errors in judgement isn't the thing he needs I don't think.
2006-11-09
00:27:33 ·
update #2
MJ Forever. Your answer is very heartfelt. But when you say that he needs to be able trust someone. Why can't he trust his own fans to tell him to seek help? That's my point. He doesn't need a lot of blinkered fans telling him he's amazing and that he does nothing wrong he needs realistic support to seek help.
2006-11-09
20:46:54 ·
update #3
I'm not a MJ fan but i think some of his music was OK, so can i answer ?
I think its double standards. I could not udnerstand how so many people can stand outside a court chanting that they KNOW he is innocent, how does that work ?
Any other person under the same charges would be bombarded with hate and insults.
The root of his, and other pop stars, problems is that they are surrounded by "yes men". No one in his inner circle of aquaintences wants to say "hey, michael, this is wrong, stop it". All he gets is people saying how great he is, he sees this as vindication that what he's doing is right.
His fans do him a dis-service with thier unquestioning defence of him.
I hate it when fans say "arrh, but he had a bad upbringing". So what ? didn't half of us ?
And howcome, MJ is great and innocent, but Gary Glitter is a creep and guilty ? Is it true, or is it just that MJ has more money and it able to hide and plan better ?
2006-11-08 23:37:22
·
answer #1
·
answered by Michael H 7
·
3⤊
3⤋
Now I am telling you a story I am 24 sleep with Superman Sheets have everything full with Superman, Michael Jackson and Tinkerbell. I also sleep a lot of times with kids in my bed and I love especialy boys. I am a woman, and that is why noone things about me as a pervert, if I would be a man everyone would think I am a pervert. I also work as an Educator. And I tell you something my childhood got destroid completely. I grew up until I was one year old with the real parents which didn't care about me or my brother, no food, hitting and much more bad staff, it endet when I turned 7 and found the best and carrying parents in this world. But before that everything was crep and pain. I live now my childhood, and thats why I have no problem with that Michael sleeps with does children in the same bad. First of all everyone things directly about sex and he is a man, which makes it more strange. If he thinks he is peter pan fine with me, he was helping so many people not only children, spend million of his money. And the only thing were poeple could destroy him with is his behavior with children. But let me ask you something, many people say he paid the boy million to be quit 93. But when you get sexual abused really you won't nothing more than to see this person behind bars, no money on this earth can change your pain, believe me. And than this boy get everything paid, the mother get everything paid. She also robbed a store and when she got catched she claimed the owner abused her son sexual, and they drop the case, excuse me but this boy and his whole family has in my opinion to go behind bars. I hope and I don't care how many dumb I get down, that Michael stills does what he did always, spend time with kids, because he did never such a thing to those kids. And sure he is responsible for his own actions, but how would you feel when your life would be like his, you can't trust anyone, you can't go anywhere. You always live in danger, and soooo lonely. And I also think he needs help, but he needs someone which he can trust and someone who really cares about him as the person. If I could I would direktly marry him. I love him more than anything on this earth. I just hope the people would let him alone. He is living his live like he wants, but mostly like we making him too.
And which mother would let sleeping his child in his bad, if I would not trust him never.
F uck the press michael is the best.
2006-11-09 15:44:03
·
answer #2
·
answered by Jessica 4
·
3⤊
0⤋
I think he is literally a 'lost boy'. I adore all his music, film, videos and dancing. Im not sure on how much i can comment on his actions of the past few years ive only heard on what has been portrayed through the vast media which i feel much is corrupt.
Dont get me wrong though alot of media opens up issues for the public to be aware such as the UK's government 'cash for peerages' i think something is very wrong there and im grateful for the News teams to bring it to our attention.
I think what Micheal may of been wrong of is saying how he feels to the press such as the comment ' i am Peter Pan' i feel like that sometimes because i like the feeling of not growing up most of the time but i have to because ive faced the fact that i have to work and earn a living and get myself the best life i can..where as Micheal has the riches so maybe he doesnt have the responsibility that we all have grasp?!
This is a hard subject to have the all values, ethos, views on as we all have been brought up differently and are of all different ages..
Well is MJ coming back?? I heard through the news lol that he will be making a come back with a new Thriller video in the UK? Will this happen?
Or will millions of pounds be wasted...
His fate is uncertain.....
2006-11-09 07:38:23
·
answer #3
·
answered by Rose L 2
·
1⤊
1⤋
I'm not a fan, so maybe i shouldn't answer, but I can't help it, because you so much hit the nail on the head. I thought I was the only one who thinks that way. I hated it when fans outside the courtroom were shouting "innocent"! Some of them spent weeks there, don't they have jobs to go to? He already had had one trial in early 90s, so why on earth did he continue doing it with kids? And it was boys only.
That he was found not guilty doesn't mean he's innocent. And the jury knew they couldn't reach any other verdict. Maybe they wanted to get back to their families and were sick of the trial. And have you noticed that it was Macaulay Culkin who saved him? Of course he was paid - when was the last time the guy made a successful movie or was anyhow successful?
And another point, if an Average Joe was accused of crime he didn't commit, there would be people outside the court shouting "innocent".
That's about it.
2006-11-09 10:23:20
·
answer #4
·
answered by La 7
·
0⤊
2⤋
Yes i would be concerned its not every day behaviour you would expect from a grown man. but saying that doesn't mean i believe his a child molester I'm in the view that he is trapped .Michael appears to have been changing his appearance to that of a white woman (Elizabeth Taylor?) which makes me think of Gender dysphoria ( Tran sexuality) his voice and mannerisms are effeminate making some people think he might be gay but i think more gender identity confusion than sexuality. This could stem back to his childhood and supposed treatment he received from his Father and his closeness to Elizabeth making her a role model . His child friends could also be explained as escaping back to childhood also the reason there boys is boys hanged out in the main with other boys. So Michael has a complex Syndrome which I'm surprised has not been seriously looked at or maybe it has. I might be wrong with some of my results of analysing Michael but i think its worth looking into by experts. If Michael got proper support early on maybe those court cases would have never happened.
2006-11-09 09:07:43
·
answer #5
·
answered by jack lewis 6
·
3⤊
0⤋
First of all what is so wrong about Peter Pan some grownups like Winnie The Pooh too?! Second yes Michael admitted to having boys sleep in his room but his bedroom is 2 stories and bigger than most people's houses!! The man down the street wouldn't have to cover his kids' heads in public because the paparazzi would not be following him!! That balcony thing was blown way out of proportion, all he did was show the fans the baby they wanted to see so bad!! He didn't admit to having boys sleep in his bed but in his room! We the fans have to defend him because there are so many judge mental MJ haters out there just like you!! Why don't you haters stop being so jealous of MJ and just leave him alone and get on with your own lives!!
â¥â¥We Love You Michael!!!!â¥â¥
2006-11-09 08:19:15
·
answer #6
·
answered by ♥Stranger In Maine™♥ (Thriller) 7
·
4⤊
2⤋
I disagree with Charai on this because Wacko Jacko will be back in the news big time soon.
Michaels publicist was on tv not long ago saying there are talks going on about a few small concerts in the US, you just know as soon as that happens he will be on tv again everywhere as we discuss this very subject.
I don't think most fans are blinkered, i've bought just about every album and seen him in concert 3 times so inline with most people or maybe a bit more.
I wont be buying any new release or going to see him again, i think he's guilty as hell and should burn as Frank Skinner put it.
I was in Turkey recently and there are loads of Jackson impersonators in the bars and clubs yet nobody walked out, nobody complained even when there were lots of children about.
I think he got away with it rather than found innocent, and many people have forgotten already about what he did.
This is not the last we've heard about M J, in fact, i think it's just the beginning of round 2.
2006-11-09 07:35:51
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
2⤋
you are right, he has behaved inapropriately with boys in his house but remember those children had full permision from there parents , infact most parents encouraged it hoping for hand outs, i believe a lot of those parents should have been on trial, mj is very childlike and has never lived in the real world and i think , needs some kind of help and probably shouldn`t be a father, call him all the loons under the sun... but, none of this makes him guilty of being an actual evil paedophile, which is why he was found not guilty...
2006-11-09 07:58:00
·
answer #8
·
answered by Loo 4
·
2⤊
2⤋
There were no secret rooms.
He'd rather be able to take his kids out and cover their faces, than, like other celebrities, not be able to take their kids out at all. With his popularity and uncanny magnetism with paparazzi, it's a huge risk having photos of his kids taken and have twisted stories come out.
In some way, he is messed up due to his childhood upbringing.
It is also known that the first prosecuting lawyer in his first case was also the same one in his second case. Both attempts in convicting him failed. And both times, defending lawyers were able to prove the unscrupulous intentions of the accuser, money. That's the justice system, baby. Not guilty. Love it or move to another country, like Iraq or Afghanistan.
2006-11-09 07:36:10
·
answer #9
·
answered by Squeaks 3
·
6⤊
1⤋
i'm a fan of michaels music and his talent. it's a shame all the other stuff in his life has happened and he's made the choices he has made, but we can't condemn him for any of it. it's not OUR job. we can not shun people just for mistakes they've made. i won't do it for family members and friends and i refuse to do it to celebrities. i admit that at times there are a lot of celebrities who i can't stand and who make awful life choices, but i can not wish them any illwill. everyone has hard lives and things they have to overcome. it's not easy for anyone. michael does need help, but a bunch of people turning against him or trying to burn him at the stake will not help him and is a waste of people's time. i choose to still be a fan of the talented former member of the jackson 5 and remember what he was. i know the things he's done and that they are not right. there are no rose colored glasses covering my eyes. but again, we CAN NOT condemn him!
2006-11-09 08:01:11
·
answer #10
·
answered by bored_ass_little_girl 5
·
3⤊
0⤋