How about breaking international laws by invading Iraq? How about starting a war on shady, unproven, assumed facts? How about passing a law to legalize the torture of foreigners? How about condoning the loss of any amount of life of foreign civilians as well as getting thousands of AMERICAN soldiers killed for his own selfish reasons? Conservatives are the stupidest people on the planet. You're worse than the damn terrorists. You blindly follow someone who so clearly isn't going to help anything but himself, and then act like you have a RIGHT to preach about others being misguided. I could already see the next thing that would've been to go. Most likely the separation of Church and State. Even though I highly doubt GWB gives a damn about Christians of Christian morals, I know he'd pass that just to keep anyone who opposes him off his back for being so "righteous". Republicans and conservatives alike are hypocrites. You did NOTHING to deserve what you have. And you don't believe in helping those who weren't as fortunately as yourselves. You're disgusting, how can you call yourself "pro-life" if you would allow someone to die on the streets just because they don't have as much money as you do.
2006-11-08 22:53:08
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
2⤋
It is possible that Democrats will bring impeachment against the president. All that is required is a simple majority in the House which the Democrats possess. However, to remove a sitting president requires a 2/3 majority in the Senate which they don't have. Impeachment proceedings would be a useless waste of time and money as no charges have been presented which meet the standard. This action is not supported by the majority of people in the United States. The proceedings would stretch into the next election cycle and would not only damage Democrat credibility, but also voter confidence. There is a faction of the party that wishes to bring impeachment so only time will tell.
RoseSpectre666: There was no violation of international law. Iraq was in violation of 17 UN resolutions and ceasefire agreements. This is justification to reinvade. You can argue that the inelligence was faulty, but it will never stand up as justification. Every member of congress saw the same information and voted accordingly. Further there is ample evidence from Democrats that they believed these contentions regarding Iraq prior to Mr. Bush becoming president. This statement is born out by actual recorded statements from most mainstream Democrats prior to January 2001 regarding Iraq. The president does not pass laws, he only signs them, the Congress crafts the legislation. So on every other contention you make you might as be prepared to impeach every sitting member of the House and Senate who voted for any of the things you mentioned.
RoseSpectre666: How do you know whether I deserve what I have. I have worked hard in my life to achieve what I have and you have no knowledge of what charities I support. You call Conservatives blind, but I would rather be blind than suffer from your holier than thou attitude regarding everyone who doesn't agree with your distasteful and disrespectful rhetoric. Are you a Christian? Because you certainly aren't displaying any respect, faith, integrity or morals in your charaterizations of others.
2006-11-08 22:55:28
·
answer #2
·
answered by Bryan 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
To begin with, impeach means to bring charges against someone. They can't bring charges against him because he hasn't broken the law. Clinton was impeached, just not removed from office. Clinton broke the law when he lied under oath. So, you tell me, just how will they impeach him when he hasn't broken the law? Trumped up charges? Twisting the law to suit themselves?
And finally, who are the powerhungry-maniacs? It's the Dems who went crazy trying to (and unfortunately succeeding) gain power in Congress. Not that it will do any good. Bush still has the Power of Veto and they don't have the 2/3 majority needed to override his veto.
2006-11-08 22:45:36
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
That is not grounds for impeachment
2006-11-08 22:46:06
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
How can you think that he may be impeached? was has he done to deserve that?
2006-11-08 22:44:04
·
answer #5
·
answered by dorianalways 4
·
2⤊
0⤋
No, I do not.
2006-11-08 22:40:55
·
answer #6
·
answered by The_Cricket: Thinking Pink! 7
·
1⤊
0⤋
No.
2006-11-08 22:40:23
·
answer #7
·
answered by kitty fresh & hissin' crew 6
·
2⤊
0⤋