???????
2006-11-08 20:32:16 · 10 answers · asked by angelonavaro 1 in Social Science ➔ Psychology
This is not psychologist's jargon, as proported by some.
Trying to keep it simple:
Our memories may not be exact, but a memory, say of an experience from the distant past may be a reconstruction, the person reinvents it to some extent.
Perception is coloured by experience. If scared by a bunny rabbit, if confronted by several or even one, a harmless bunny may be percieved as harmful or completely dangerous.
So we humans are constantly comparing memories and currently experienced or wittnessed things against the things we have experienced. It may have been the bunny only tickled you with its ears, but you see it like others may fear a lion, though for different reasons. Fear of a lion is rational, fear of the bunny isn't.
I hope this helps at least a little.
2006-11-15 19:22:01 · answer #1 · answered by Charles-CeeJay_UK_ USA/CheekyLad 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
That's just psychologists' jargon. A constructive process is a term used to describe things like perception and memory.
2006-11-08 20:37:18 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Wit out memory perception is not possible.It is just like software or primary data in a computer.When ever a new event is seen ,brain checks with memory and then it gets the perception.
2006-11-16 14:54:14 · answer #3 · answered by leowin1948 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
There is nothing constructive about memory, It's black or white. You either remember or you don't.
Perception is abstract and can be any shade of any colour that you want it to be and therefore, can be either constructive or destructive depending on the way that you see it
2006-11-16 14:57:40 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
i do no longer think of there is such a topic with the aid of fact the main effectual emotion or theory technique. We fairly lots prefer all of them; in some cases one is greater smart than yet another. i does no longer classify 'information' as an emotion or theory technique. it particularly is lots too wide. yet, given what you're saying, you ought to be interested in analyzing Carl Rogers. He talks a fabulous style of being 'congruent' or 'sparkling' or 'actual' -- the place what we prepare others, what we are experiencing, and what is going on deeply with us are each and all of the comparable: we are conscious of all 3, and that all of them experience. I have no religious or religious ideals.
2016-10-03 10:58:46 · answer #5 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Memories need to be reconstructed to remember but perception?
2006-11-08 20:36:34 · answer #6 · answered by Powerpuffgeezer 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
You must have also heard the saying 'for something to have a action, it has to have an equal + opposite reaction'.
Meaning - for something to work it has to have a range both sides of it otherwise it won't do anything.. Maximum- minimum, plus or minus, positive- negative... Etc
2006-11-15 16:00:26 · answer #7 · answered by msj2uk 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Both when percieving and remembering you sort of build or construct an image/notion in your head, that's why I think they are called so.
2006-11-08 20:39:00 · answer #8 · answered by mamenco 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I'm not sure.!
In fact, I have to admit that I have never in my 50+ years heard "them" or anyone say that phrase! How curious!
Sash.
2006-11-15 14:27:42 · answer #9 · answered by sashtou 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
it means that they develop as we grow and mature, we are not born with our full ability in these areas
2006-11-08 20:48:44 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋