Both falsified evidence that took America to needless war in Iraq and inevitable losses.
2006-11-08 20:11:56 · 10 answers · asked by True F 1 in News & Events ➔ Current Events
And your proof is?
2006-11-08 20:13:46 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 2⤋
George Bush should face impeachment and removal from office; And, along with those who colluded to manufacture this war, Bush should be subject to the laws of the International Criminal Court (ICC), also known as the Hague.
The following is from the "Downing Street Memo":
"It seemed clear that Bush had made up his mind to take military action, even if the timing was not yet decided. But the case was thin. Saddam was not threatening his neighbours, and his WMD capability was less than that of Libya, North Korea or Iran. We should work up a plan for an ultimatum to Saddam to allow back in the UN weapons inspectors. This would also help with the legal justification for the use of force.
The Attorney-General said that the desire for regime change was not a legal base for military action. There were three possible legal bases: self-defence, humanitarian intervention, or UNSC authorisation. The first and second could not be the base in this case. Relying on UNSCR 1205 of three years ago would be difficult."
The "Downing Street Memo" reveals that WMDs, or "terrorism" were not the actual concern of those planning the war but a "regime-change" that would establish a U.S. controlled Iraq.
The main theory for a coup, "regime-change" can be found by examining the Hussein's decision in 2000 to allow only Euros in oil transactions and its implications on U.S. dollar hegemony (supremacy). However, economic concerns (even when explicitly stated) are not a legal, (nor a morally just) cause to initiate acts of aggression against a nation which was not an eminent threat.
2006-11-09 07:05:17 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
NO ~ We should not give the satisfaction to the terrorist this is what they WANT for your government to fall apart and be divided. Why should we give into the terrorist and the other extremist. They would take that as they WON the war on terror!
WE NEED TO START ACTING LIKE RESPECTABLE AMERICANS AND GET A LONG!
Just on the news today the terrorist feel they are winning the war!
We need to STAND together and show SUPPORT to the TROOPS
2006-11-09 11:08:32 · answer #3 · answered by beaner 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yes well more than likely. I mean if Donald Rumsfeld is gone than why aren't they. As someone who lives outside of the US and has been seeing coverage of the election - I think you guys are doing a great job yourself of ousting them.
2006-11-09 04:19:02 · answer #4 · answered by gretphemelger 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
....and all of the Americans waved their flags and cheered them on. But what the heck.....let's just blame them.
The Americans deserve George and Dick....leave them be.
2006-11-09 04:23:23 · answer #5 · answered by Jack 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
that is called impeachment...in usa history never had a double impeachment.
plus that is up to congress and they just are now taking office after the election....give them time...sheez
2006-11-09 04:14:14 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
Yeah , remove them , kick them to the curb :-D
2006-11-09 04:15:06 · answer #7 · answered by willow, the yodakitty from hell 7 · 0⤊ 1⤋
The problem is: By whom?
2006-11-09 04:48:28 · answer #8 · answered by Avner Eliyahu R 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
YES. But it will never happen!
2006-11-09 07:11:10 · answer #9 · answered by stoner38 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
anyway they are going.... wait for a while.
2006-11-09 04:19:31 · answer #10 · answered by gujjubadshah 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋