click this link for details before you decide :)
http://members.optusnet.com.au/~eelnek/mypic9.gif
2006-11-08 19:59:57 · 6 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Other - Politics & Government
Good to be removed rather than forced to remain.
2006-11-08 20:02:58 · answer #1 · answered by FRAGINAL, JTM 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Hey Jesus, just wanted to thank you for bringing all those scandals to light just before the election. I figured you had to be about sick of the republicans using you and your dad to push their agendas through. As for Rumsfeld, well, of course he bailed, when they start investigating 9/11 the whole house of cards is going to fall and being the "military strategist" that he is, he cut and run.
2006-11-09 04:40:10 · answer #2 · answered by Hillaryforpresident 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Too bad our "fearless leader" didn't take the lead so he could of led Rummy by example!
2006-11-09 05:20:47 · answer #3 · answered by paulisfree2004 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
yeah..I'd "cut and run" too, before the democrats spark the investigation on Bush Administration.
2006-11-09 04:04:21 · answer #4 · answered by ? 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Well, the trash went out---only problem is, they left behind the recycled bush.
:D
2006-11-09 04:04:00 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Rumsfeld was no warrior! In addition, he was incompetent!
2006-11-09 04:19:28 · answer #6 · answered by cantcu 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋