He won't be impeached. There is really no point in attempting to do so, it would only cost America money we don't have. I believe there are valid reasons for impeachment but at this time I think it is more important for Congress to deal with more important issues like the war in Iraq and the economy.
2006-11-08 20:48:15
·
answer #1
·
answered by Hillaryforpresident 5
·
0⤊
1⤋
This would be true if Chaney were not taken to court along with Bush as Stanley Hilton's law suit entails...maybe other plans similar to this are in the making
2006-11-08 19:29:52
·
answer #2
·
answered by dogpatch USA 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
it isn't documented that Bush ruined u.s.. Low unemployment? Low prices of interest? Low inflation? severe GDP develop? How is that ruining u.s.? Now contained in the most suitable 2 years we had a Democrat Congress and issues began to drop. They blocked reform tries on the housing guidelines by Bush. most of the costs Bush receives blamed for, like No toddler Left in the back of, are honestly Democrat costs (this one replaced into Ted Kenedy's). Impeach Obama? not yet. yet they're really searching on the unlawful contributions to his marketing campaign by overseas and fictitious members. we are giving him an similar scrutiny you gave Bush. You earned this after the most suitable 8 years.
2016-11-28 23:00:15
·
answer #3
·
answered by northcut 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
If there is evidence, The Congress could impeach Bush and the successor is Cheney according to the Constitution.
2006-11-08 19:27:40
·
answer #4
·
answered by FRAGINAL, JTM 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
I much prefer Bush, but I don't really hate him all that much anyway. But it's kind of a moot point, because Pelosi already said they're not going to seek to impeach him. I almost wish they would try, because then I could laugh because there's no reason to impeach him, and they'd just look stupid.
That's probably why they're NOT trying. They know there's no reason to impeach him.
2006-11-08 19:28:05
·
answer #5
·
answered by The_Cricket: Thinking Pink! 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
George bush will NOT be impeached.
He will, however literally be sidestepped by the Democrats. That is, they'll write laws, and vote the laws at a 2/3rds majority vote and theres nothing Bush can do to stop it.
Should Bush have been impeached? Yes on the same charges that Saddam Hussein was found guilty of- crimes against humanity for the killing of 45,000 people in Iraq
2006-11-08 19:28:33
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
3⤋
Why can't anyone spell?! I think Cheney (there's no a in his last name, look it up) is the puppetmaster behind everything Bush has done. taking away the puppet and putting in his master doesn't change much. Much more unfortunately, neither Bush nor Cheney will be impeached. It's just not happening. I think people who think it will happen are just being arrogant, but it could just be wishful thinking.
2006-11-08 19:45:13
·
answer #7
·
answered by americanmimeboy 4
·
0⤊
1⤋
Impeachement do not get you out of the White House. Look at Clinton and Monica. He didn't resign, so why should Bush?
2006-11-08 19:28:18
·
answer #8
·
answered by ginger13 4
·
4⤊
0⤋
Because they are stupid Democrats drunk with a political victory. But soon the stupor will wear off and they will see just what they have done. They will come to know that their fantasy world is just that-- a fantasy. They have to produce now; they can no longer sit on the sidelines and call names. I predict they will fail abysmally because they see everything through rose-colored glasses. They have no concept of reality. The enemy wants every American DEAD. The Dems think they can sing campfire songs with them and everything will be hunkey-dorey. Not the case, but we'll let them find that out on their own...
2006-11-08 19:32:36
·
answer #9
·
answered by christopher s 5
·
3⤊
0⤋
Why would Bush be impeached?
2006-11-08 19:27:16
·
answer #10
·
answered by ash 3
·
2⤊
0⤋