2006-11-08 17:46:08 · 10 answers · asked by Anonymous in Sports ➔ Basketball
No, no, a million times no.
2006-11-08 18:17:00 · answer #1 · answered by diamondrfk 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
shaq had all the hype when he was a rookie! and right away he became the starting center for orlando! in the other hand, bynum spent his rookie year on the lakers bench!
but bynum has the body, size and potential to become the next shaq, better than shaq? we don't know! he's still 19y/o, lets see after four or five years?
2006-11-08 20:06:26 · answer #2 · answered by NeiL S 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Shaq is simply awesome in his rookie year at orlando ,Andrew bynum was not given much playing time at his rookie season but the kids got potential
2006-11-08 23:25:52 · answer #3 · answered by Turero 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
andrew bynum is much better now than the last season and i think he will be the next shaq!!!! or even surpassing shaq is possible for bynum w/ he's skills and great coaches like kareem and phil!!!!!!!!!
2006-11-09 00:06:23 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Andrew Bynum the mathematician? He was better than most, but better than Shaq? I don't know. With his degree in advanced astrophysics, he must have something on the ball too. But, as we all know, only one ever won the pulitzer. So, that is who my vote goes to.
You didnt even mention Kwarzak though. He took on Rasmussen in Russia and won big time!
2006-11-08 17:55:24 · answer #5 · answered by k r i s 3 · 0⤊ 2⤋
no longer yet Bynum shocked me this season. He could end out being a starter. he's low-placed up strikes have incredibly greater, heck each and every component to his game has greater, loose-throws i do no longer be conscious of. however the West is tied up with skills there nevertheless a hand-packed with centers that could properly be there....Yao, Chandler..etc
2016-12-17 06:50:10 · answer #6 · answered by ? 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
NO...he's cant matchup with shaq.
2006-11-09 12:15:19 · answer #7 · answered by samdesign78 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Only time will tell http://sports.yahoo.com/nba/photo?slug=getty-71797339mw017_ca_minnesota__1_20_53_am&prov=getty
2006-11-08 18:12:33 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
give him some time, he'll be on and off i suspect
2006-11-08 18:32:43 · answer #9 · answered by superman 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
maybe
2006-11-09 18:33:00 · answer #10 · answered by . 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋