Do you think we will ever reverse Roe Vs Wade and how?

Question

I think people should take personal responsibility for themselves and not have sex before marriage. Have we gone so far that we do not care about our actions?

Answer 1

It will never be reversed. People have become addicted to the sadistic killing of the innocent for the sake of convenience... much like the Romans became addicted to watching innocent people get ripped apart in the coliseums... much like hitler became addicted to torturing innocent people to death. Its a mental sickness and it will not go away. Its not a normal human attribute to want to kill your offspring. However, for some reason I will never understand, America has embraced killing the most innocent and defenseless people that could ever exist. Don't touch the whales though!!! You will go to prison for that.....

Answer 2

No, I don't think it will happen, nor do I think it should be completely reversed, even though I personally am against it. There should be more restrictions on it though:
1. Absolutely NO abortions in the third trimester unless it's a matter of life and death.
2. Abortions in the second trimester should be restricted to victims of DOCUMENTED sexual assault (she had to have gone to a hospital to receive the post-sexual assault examination), or when it's a matter of life and death.
3. First trimester should be completely unrestricted.
4. Doctors who perform abortions need to disclose to their potential patients ALL risks involved, including emotional AND physical risks.
5. Minors must have parent permission, although this should be waivered if they reside in an abusive home.

More importantly, people DO need to take responsibility for their actions. Don't want children? Don't have sex! Or use precautions!
But we live in a society where people place more blame on EVERYTHING and EVERYONE else except for themselves. Until such a time when personal responsibility can be the norm, it's an unattainable dream that there won't be a need for abortion anymore.

Answer 3

It's not about personal responsibility. What you are proposing is the ultimate example of taking away personal responsibility. Because what you are proposing means the government gets to make all the decisions, and there is no personal choice at all.

Face it. In any situation involving the right to choose and bodily integrity, whether for abortion or medical care or anything else, someone is going to make the choice. It's either going to be the individual or the government.

I pray to the gods that our government never has the legal authority to decide who gets to be pregnant and who does not, who can what what medical procedures and who cannot. I can't imagine anyone wanting to live in a world where they have no choice over what happens to their own body, because someone else gets to make that choice for them.

Have we gone so far, that we deny people the right to choose what happens within their own bodies, just because we don't always like their choices?

Freedom of choice is not a minority position, just because the majority happens to disagree with the choice the minority makes.

Answer 4

My experience is that when people are so concerned about my actions and what I do about them, they usually have something darker and more sinister that they are hiding and are trying to distract others from it by pointing fingers.
Roe V. Wade simply allows the alternative of abortion to be done in a safe manner rather than relegating it to back allies and being performed by any hack with a knife or a coat hanger. Historically, people have sought them, legal or not, and this will not change by strong arming the public with superficial values.. It would only drive them underground and cause more harm than good.

Answer 5

I'm not sure what they will do with it. This is always a heated debate. I am not saying abortion is or is not wrong, because I don't need to start a huge fight on the topic. I do however, want to encourage everyone to read about how it is done and pass the word. I think if people knew exactly what was happening, they would think twice and maybe be more responsible.

Answer 6

this would be a hard question. i think abortion would desire to be made available for people who % to apply it. in spite of the undeniable fact that, i'm able to work out Roe v. Wade being overturned and that i do no longer think of it somewhat is a stable factor. the difficulty is that case says abortion is a constitutionally secure action hence no state can create legislations inhibiting it. yet, abortion is in no way suggested interior the Consitution hence it is going to be a tenth substitute subject and could fall onto the states to settle on in my opinion. in case you learn Constitutional history you will locate that the politics of the courtroom are like a pendulum... swinging from ideal to left and returned ideal returned in distinctive eras. The early twentieth century perfect courtroom replaced into consevative, then the mid to previous due twentieth century perfect courtroom replaced into extra liberal and it variety of feels to be moving returned to the marvelous immediately. So it somewhat is in no way unbelievable that the courts ought to absolutely swing returned to the marvelous and overturn Roe v. Wade.

Answer 7

No!

Look, you can't eliminate it. However, you can reduce the number of abortions if you are serious. Free birth control, welfare and governmental assistance programs if they have the child, better sex education so they know where babies come from. Humans are sexual beings. it is our most basic instinct.

Even the Puritans had rampant births, 6 months after marriage. It was because of quick marriages after learning that there was a kid on the way, not premature babies.

It is human nature. If you want to reduce abortions, stop crying and tell your representatives that you want more programs to assist poor people who choose to have the child. Anything less is hypocritical!

Answer 8

I dont think R vs W will ever be overturned - Not because of the differences of opinion of morality of abortion but the complication of the issue of the right of privacy.

If R vs W do get overturned and then taken to an extreme, every child bearing woman, girl and grandma will have to report to the government if they have a period for that month and continue to do so until she reaches menopause.

Answer 9

No.
It is not the government's responsibility to take control of people's personal relationships. Telling people how to have sex or not to have sex is inappropriate.
If you have strong moral beliefs for yourself, then live by them! That is your own example.
Being pro-choice does not necessarily mean pro-abortion. It means a woman has the place to choose what happens within her own body.

Answer 10

if you think that people will wait for marriage to have sex..... you are out of touch with reality...... we live in a country dominated by power and sex!!!!!!! this is what guides our actions.....

noble wishful thinking though....

reversing roe vs. wade will not change this..... it will only make getting an abortion harder, not impossible!!!!!