English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

On Dr. Phil, an episode started on Friday the 3rd til Tuesday the 7th. With 3yr old Kailee, do you really think he dad Jeremy did all the things he was accused of????

2006-11-08 17:18:22 · 10 answers · asked by C Lou 1 in Entertainment & Music Television

10 answers

The father took his child to hospital because the had a LESS THAN ONE INCH scratch on her labia.

OK.

And he is dumb, inarticulate, and a perfect mark for any conniving ex who wants to gain total custody of the child.

Who are the 'they' the child referred to as having touched her? Is he a multiple personality? doubt it.

BTW, you ought to read this blog about the tactics of the Dr Phil website:
http://bluemlein.blogspot.com/
Thursday, November 09, 2006
CENSORSHIP DANCE WITH DR. PILL IN THE LAND OF THE FREE AND HOME OF THE BRAVE

2006-11-09 12:56:50 · answer #1 · answered by kerangoumar 6 · 1 0

Hell no!
Put yrself in his place: if YOU had molested the child, would you go on national TV especially at a time & in a place where that act is the worst thing you could be accused of?

I'd look at the mom and granny coaching the child; I'd look at their boyfriends; I'd look at other people around the father's household.

The reason I disbelieve the father's guilt is that I think he is literally too dumb and poorly educated to understand half of what was being said; he was very conscious of being in front of a mostly female audience; he took his daughter to hospital when she had a less-than-ONE-INCH scrape on her labia - it is easy to misidentify medical terms such as abrasions - you can be sure if the labia were actually torn in the way most people think when they hear that, there would have been a far more serious outcome; he was cleared TWICE by children's services investigators.

This is being used by the mother in a custody fight, you can be sure.

Incidentally lie detector tests are NOT ADMISSIBLE IN COURT. Do you need to ask why?

AND PS - it is not true that because you were molested as a child you will automatically become a molester!

2006-11-11 06:20:30 · answer #2 · answered by sophronia 2 · 1 0

I was convinced he did based on his strange behaviour, and my instinct was confirmed with the results of the lie detector test. However, on the postscript of the show, Dr. Phil said that Jeremy had subsequently passed a second lie detector test. This opens up a whole new can of worms as to the validity of the tests, and where the truth lies. So, without more information other than what I've seen, I just don't know.

2006-11-10 16:02:09 · answer #3 · answered by sweet_leaf 7 · 1 0

I watched all three episodes. I am sure he molested that baby. It's sick, it's wrong, and he better be happy I'm not her mom. When his wife has her baby, they should make her take a lie detector test. I think she knew about it. How could she not know? The sad thing is, this stuff happens ALL THE TIME, and not everyone can go on Dr. Phil. The dad is sick.

2006-11-10 11:57:17 · answer #4 · answered by teeney1116 5 · 0 1

Yes I do. If it wasn't him than it was some body else because her labia was tore. Can't any body explain how and why that happened. He also failed his lie detector test. i would have had him arrested the moment the test results came in and he failed. The only thing that he told the truth about was that he didn't take pictures of her. I hate people like that who do stuff to little children like that. What was he getting out of doing that to her. Dr. Phill should have had the police waiting on him. The mother should take him to court and get full custody of Kailee.

2006-11-09 05:20:01 · answer #5 · answered by mocha 3 · 1 2

Yes, I watched it. I definitely think he did but I also think he has MAJOR mental problems!!!!! He's a very weird person. That one part was really strange when Dr. Phil asked if he knew any1 growing up that was molested as a child and he said "Hmm, let me think...... molested as a child molested as a child molested as a child..molested molested molested..molested as a child..... No" Like c'mon, that's not a sign of issues? And when he took so long to think? What's to think about? Either you did it or you didn't!!!! I hope he gets the help he needs and to be put away!!!

2006-11-10 08:15:58 · answer #6 · answered by bcch89 4 · 1 1

Ya know, that's sooo hard to say....
I'm not really sure. I think he needs to do the hypnosis thing he was suggesting. I also think that he was molested as a child, therefore the chance of him doing that is very likely.....
It sure is sad.....People like that are 'very' good liars...And him denying it in front of millions of people, if in fact he is guilty, is just how those kinds of people work. He's said he's innocent soooo many times, he probably believes it himself....(again, if in fact he's guilty.
I'm sure they'll be a follow up on that....
Dr. Phil kept saying his concern was Kailee. Wouldn't it be a drag if they put her through the motions as if she was molested...(doctors, physciatrist...etc...), and she hadn't been..?
That could be traumatizing in itself.....
Gooday! !

2006-11-08 17:33:20 · answer #7 · answered by Sweetea 4 · 1 2

Yes, i believe the perv did it. Now he wants to be hypnotized. At the end of the show it did say that he took a second lie detector test and passed it but i still believe he did it. I did watch all 3 episodes of that and it made me sick the way they kept exploiting that poor little girl. One time of that "they touched my pee-pee" was more than enough to get the point across.

2006-11-08 17:36:52 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0 2

Llike I said for another question - he doesn't listen. That baby, I hear, kept saying 'they'. THEY? Who is 'they'? And I don't watch that show because it's sick. He's always bullying somebody.

2006-11-12 04:20:03 · answer #9 · answered by thalia v 1 · 0 0

Yes ands Yes

2006-11-09 04:49:36 · answer #10 · answered by LORD Z 7 · 1 1

fedest.com, questions and answers