1. What could be represented = what is represented
2. What could be represented ≤ what is represented
3. What could be represented ≥ what is represented
Of 1, 2, & 3, which one is correct?
2006-11-08 16:45:34 · 13 answers · asked by The Knowledge Server 1 in Arts & Humanities ➔ Philosophy
ONE
2006-11-08 16:48:15 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
i guess 3. what could be represented cannot be less than what is represented. And I think that what we represent (in any context) is always less than what could potentially be represented.
2006-11-09 00:53:18 · answer #2 · answered by student_of_life 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
#1. What could be represented is represented because if it has not been discovered yet then it cannot be represented because it dosen't exist.
2006-11-09 00:54:35 · answer #3 · answered by whitetrashwithmoney 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
None.
What could be represented = what is possible to be represented/ what was possible to be (have been) represented.
2006-11-09 00:57:50 · answer #4 · answered by mrquestion 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I would choose 3 because there are many undiscovered things that can be represented but are not because they are undiscovered. Also minorities are under-represented.
2006-11-09 00:48:56 · answer #5 · answered by chatthetree 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
3.
2006-11-09 00:48:12 · answer #6 · answered by KK 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Let me rephrase them:
1) says: Only one thing 'could be', only one thing 'is'
2) says: Only one thing 'could be', many things 'are'
3) says: Many things 'could be', one thing 'is'
to me, 3 seems to be the most correct
2006-11-09 02:44:10 · answer #7 · answered by brian-upstairs 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
3 think of what could be and how to make it be.
2006-11-09 08:32:56 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Sistani wins.
2006-11-09 04:50:10 · answer #9 · answered by -.- 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
which one could be correct ⥠which one is correct
2006-11-12 16:52:25 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
These are all arabic numerals ordained by Allah and all must be correct.
2006-11-09 00:48:23 · answer #11 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 1⤋