YOU COULD REPRESENT ONLY THOSE COULD REPRESENT YOU. What is your opinion on this?

Question

A = B only if B=A.

A could represent B only if B could represent A.
You could represent x only if x could represent you.
You could represent only those could represent you.
------------------------------------
Kindly correct me!

Answer 1

That's a bunch of crap. A is far superior to B.
A can not only represent B but A is over qualified.
Therefore B is a moron. He can't hang in A's shadow.
So my opinion is, nope. That's a bogus statement you have on your hands.
A>=B
B<=A
.

Answer 2

You certainly have an obsession with "represent/representation/representative..." To answer your question: no, you're not right. In some contexts, maybe, but if you're looking at the big picture, no. An attorney can represent me. Can I represnt him/her? I don't think so.
And that "A=B only if B=A" is so...funny. Have you ever found, in nature, an A that is wqual to a B that is not equal to the A that is equal to it? I don't think so.

Answer 3

you are so so so so not making any sense.
Why do you keep asking the same question which to those of us who speak english can't comprehend.

Perhaps the word represent isn't the word you need to be using.
How many times do people here need to tell you that you aren't making sense.?

Please get some one to help you because this is getting verbosly tiresome

Answer 4

I prefer to think of it as you could never represent me, however I could represent you (if I were to spout nonsense).

Answer 5

i think that if A=B and B=A so it's not only represent but it can be said as the twin.. of course they can be the same on everything...

Answer 6

YOU DON"T MAKE A BIT OF LOGICAL SENSE

Answer 7

duh
Please stop