Facts on Evolution?

Question

-IF YOUR RELIGIOUS PLEASE DON'T ANSWER-Can you provide me with any facts supporting evolution. Please include links of any sort to journal articles, preferably peer reviewed. And please do not answer with a refute to evolution, if you do so i'll report you. Thanks.

Answer 1

The best sites are
http://www.aaas.org/news/press_room/evolution
http://www.talkorigins.org

Here is my evolution thing:

Every fossil, every observation in biology points to evolution. There is nothing that goes against it or points to a different way to scientifically explain modern diversity. There is not one fossil or one piece of DNA that does NOT point to evolution. It would be hard NOT to see the concrete evidence, and only those blinded by faith can do this.

Evolution is 100% world-wide accepted fact, including the evolution of man.

There is ZERO evidence for a higher being causing anything. This is why people who are religious need faith, you can't see or study the actions of a deity, by definition. Evolution has ZERO faith and ALL evidence.

Scientists (real ones) have been studying and supporting evolution for over 150 years, and still nothing has pointed to creationism. There is clear links and transitional forms between everything in the fossil record to the Class-Family level, if not Genus-Species level. And this includes humans, which there are several 'missing links' which are well described and studied, people just choose to ignore this. Sure, there are still things we don't know, but that's why science is not stagnent and dead. We learn more every day, that's what happens when you keep an open mind and follow the scientific method.

There are some areas of evolution in which all of the pieces have not been found in the fossil record, but there is no counter theory that has even ONE piece of evidence that can not easily be explained by evolution.

Let me turn the question around, if Creationism was correct and science could definitively prove Creationism (and thus the existence of God), why would they not? That would be the greatest scientific discovery in the history of the world. No one would pass that up to maintain the 'status quo'. There is no conspiracy to hide creation evidence. Anyone who knows real scientists knows they are glory-mongers first. They love to prove others wrong to enhance their own standing. And if any scientist could prove Creation/God, it would've been done a long time ago.

Go to a museum, take a class in biology, go to reputable sites on the Internet (like AAAS: http://www.aaas.org/news/press_room/evol... or http://www.talkorigins.org ) and find out for yourself.

Answer 2

The incontrovertible fact that you're pronouncing to not use a 'concept' shows that you're immediately grew to become off through the proposal of a systematic concept and deeply misunderstand what that implies. There are literal mountains of proof to help evolution however evidently you're seeing it by way of the lens of faith that's additionally blinding you. If you desire conclusive proof of evolution simply take a seem on the flu virus in your solutions. Every yr is mutates and adapts and therefore calls for us to take a look at and be forward of the 'evolution'. You acknowledged puppies that hint again to the wolf that's an additional sort of evolution that's handy to look the dramatic alterations that may occur in a brief interval of time. Imagine the energy of difference that may occur over hundreds of thousands or hundred of hundreds of thousands of years. THAT is evolution. Evolution is a truth and even as there are main points that stay uncertain it does now not disprove it. Nor is evolution there to discredit the bible. There are approach too many matters approximately the bible that discredits itself that does not require evolution to be worried. Your eyes are open however your brain is closed and none of this may increasingly make any feel till you quit seeing what you desire to look and notice what's obvious.

Answer 3

I recommed the book "the selfish gene" by richard dawkins, you can also see some of his interviews and programs he has narrated on google video or youtube.

some simple evidence for evolution is the fact that you need a new flu vaccine every year, because the virus mutates and becomes resistant to the previous years vaccine

evolution is not, as creationist describe it, random chance. there is nothing random about it, evolution is the advancement of certain traits because they increase the liklihood of survival until reproduction.

wikipeida is also a good place to start learning about the theory.

Answer 4

To faeriemagik: please learn what a scientific theory is. Hint: it has nothing to do with the lie being propagated by ignorant religious zealots that it's just a guess.

Evolution is well supported on 3 grounds: fossils, taxonomy, and molecular biology. Here are a few links explaining evolution's many forms of evidence.

Refutations of creationist lies and ignorance: http://home.austarnet.com.au/stear/default.htm
Evolution evidence from Wiki (lots of stuff here!): http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Evidence_of_evolution
Wikipedia entry on evolution: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Evolution
Another big evolution evidence page: http://www.gate.net/~rwms/EvoEvidence.html
Evidence from molecular biology: http://www.sparknotes.com/biology/evolution/evidence/section4.rhtml
Fossil genes and DNA evidence for evolution: http://www.richarddawkins.net/article,232,The-Fact-of-Evolution,Sean-Carroll--NPR-Science-Friday

I would also second the above answerer's rec of Richard Dawkins' book.

Answer 5

this wikipedia article gives a good brief description of the evidence for evolution.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Evidence_for_evolution

Answer 6

see you cant truly expect to be counted as intelligent if you only focus on one side of an issue.
(and report me on what grounds)
well i have to admit what the guy above me says why havnt we reported creationist finds, well weve tried not too many magazines want to publish our findings.

Answer 7

Evolution is a theory. Not sure if there are any facts, otherwise it would be proven as a fact...right?