English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

After a judgement in 1984 had been determined on estate settlement, it was found that a will and some deeded lots were not brought to attention of judge. From what was seen the party that was ruled in favor of knew about evidence and surpressed information.

2006-11-08 15:25:33 · 2 answers · asked by robbie 1 in Politics & Government Law & Ethics

2 answers

The probate court went according to the latest will - if the will was prepared under fraud, you would have to prove that the will was fraudulent and any property distribution should be determined based on the new will.

You need a probate attorney and you need to file a motion for a new probate hearing - the opposite side will fight you tooth and nail.

2006-11-11 10:31:38 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Yes it is possible in instances such as yours. However, the procedure for doing so is slightly different from state to state. I strongly suggest that you speak with an attorney. It may be that there is no need to revisit the settlement. It all depends on the documents and the circumstances. Please, see an attorney for sound legal advice in your area.

2006-11-08 15:34:30 · answer #2 · answered by cyanne2ak 7 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers