Is a vote for a democrat a vote for terrorists?

Question

It seems to me that this is true. There just seems to be something wrong with casting a vote that is cheered and applauded by those trying to kill us.

The simple fact of the matter is that the terrorists were losing. Bush and the republican congress had them on the run. Democrats controlling congress is a huge victory for terrorism.

Answer 1

It is, and it is sad. The terrorists know that they are off the hook now. Democrats are far more interested in prosecuting those who engaged in the war on terror, than actually engaging terrorists. remember clinton had 8 chances to kill bin laden, and chose not to too. Out of fear of the innocent civilian casualties, well, on 9-11 we had those civilian casualties, and they were ours.

Democrats find it impossible to define terrorism, let alone fight a war against it. they would rather apologize to the global community, and seek reparations for those poor terrorists, er i mean freedom fighters whom those mean neo-cons fought a war against.

even one of the democrats elected is a muslim, great win for the terrorists, especially since he is endorsed by CAIR, an organization with strong ties to Hamas and Palestinian terror organizations, and their support for sami al arian. and a strong dislike for billboards casting bin laden in a bad light.

In their headlong uneducated rush to end the war on terror, the democrats will end up prolonging the war, giving comfort and aid to our enemies, and putting those few people in the world, who were most capable of eliminating terrorists, behind bars. this is a dark day for democracy, and world peace.

where will the alqaeda democrat victory rallies be held? just wait for the fireworks. atleast we gave it a shot. now our children will pay for our failure to finish the job. democrats have turned back the clock to september 10th. Terrorists, will arm, train, and finance, just as they did under the clinton administration, under our noses, and anyone who raises an eyebrow of suspicion, will be called a racist for profiling that poor immigrant, working to get his pilots license and worship his god the way he sees fit.

God Help us, Europe has already lost the battle, We now have Eurabia. We are next for dhimmitude.

Answer 2

No, the terrorists were not losing. The American people were losing, because of all the corruption and scandals and violations of federal law that the government was doing.

Bush did not have the terrorists on the run. The pentagon never said that, and the violance and the death tolls in Iraq and Afghanistan have been steadily increasing. As have terrorist actions overseas. The situation has only been getting worse, because what we were doing obviously wasn't working.

You may not like the idea of trying something different. But where the death toll among Iraq citiziens is reaching 20,000 to 30,000 per MONTH, and the number of attacks is increasing every week, you have at least admit it's worth trying a different tactic. Even the pentagon admits that.

Answer 3

What an amazingly baiting question. Dems have not threatened investment... yet they're insistent on a plan for ending the conflict somewhat than letting this flow on continuously. Many republicans at the instant are advocating the comparable factor. it somewhat is not approximately dems and reps... it somewhat is approximately what's sane, what's stable. Terrorists have extra ammo now than they did in the previous the war. How can any patriot no longer vote for a candidate this is calling for recommendations? Political party isn't the difficulty.

Answer 4

Give it a break! Come up with something new : voting for a dem is voting for raising taxes. voting for a dem is a vote terrorism.

The world is a more dangerous place now than it was before we went to Iraq, especially IN iraq. Bush and the republican congress and senate have done nothing good for the USA or the world. I for one am glad a new day has dawned. Maybe now we will have some real oversite, and discussion, rather than the rubberstamping of whatever Bush wants.

Answer 5

Actually, the reverse is probably more true. The Republicans are usually the ones that hold the major defense contracts, and they actually NEED wars to make their money. A wartime economy is their bread and butter.
May I also add that the Bush administration were the proponents of going to war against a culture that:
1. has been fighting consistently with different sects of itself for approximately 3,000 years,
2. praises death more than life
3. is not afraid of our weapons
4. technically has nothing to lose in their minds.
So, essentially, we Americans are in the middle of a war that can't be "won". We had one terrorist attack against us that killed 3,00 people. Put that up against 4 years of warfare, 21,000 war deaths of American troops alone, and 22,000 to 100,000 of American troops wounded. That's not even touching the count of civilians dead or wounded that we were supposed to be "liberizing" that just happened to be in the way. Oh, and let's not mention the countless billions spent on this war that could've gone to feeding our starving, our education system, housing our homeless, etc. Kinda makes you wonder who the terrorists really are.

Answer 6

that phrase is as ridiculous as "love it or leave it!" love it or leave it screams cut and run. If you believe in something that has turned corrupt....you change it...you don't leave it.

And really, all parties aside....the actions in the middle east by this country over the past few years are creating new breeds of terrorists. Hell, I hate america for its actions. I'm not going to kill anyone over it, but if america's own citizens are fed up with their country, how would you feel if you were on the other side.

Imagine a stronger middle eastern country came in here, destroyed the east coast, and ousted our president saying "he is evil. We will change you into us!" and forced it upon us....you'd want to fight back too, even if you had no clue what the people fighting the cause before you were fighting about. Half the terrorists now are fighting because they are nuts-o, half are fighting americans because they see them as a direct enemy. IE: a country that bombed their house...or killed their parents in a raid.

I don't think Saddam should have stayed in power, but there was a much better way to go about it. and I REALLY wish that people would stop being so party driven. American politics have turned into a dirty slinging match based on completely irrelivant facts. Words are being twisted and actions being ignored....while all the while everyone's yelling "unamerican this" and "unamerican that"!

Republican, Democrat...who cares. Some people are just too stupid, too power hungry, and/or too incompitent to hold the position of president. And I'm talking about republicans and democrats!! Some people are stupid...end of story. Who gives a crap what party they decided to call themselves.

I wish people would care about issues not labels...and quit trying to use catch phrases and buzz words. Read a book. Study history and actions of previous politicians.

Think about this. Winston Churchill was a "bad man" in his personal life. He smoked, drank, cussed, and made sexist comments....but he was one of histories greatest leaders who made the historical outcome of WWII possible by leading england to hold out for so long under terrible odds.

Answer 7

What's really going to be funny is when all the liberals on yahoo answers realize that most of the democrats that were voted in on Tuesday are conservative. The liberals have been jumping up and down for joy, and it's really going to knock them down a peg or two when they realize that congress was LESS conservative before the election.

Answer 8

I suppose if the Democrat IS, in fact, a terrorist. I don't think the terrorism plank made it into the Democratic platform, so I guess not.

Answer 9

By the way...I am a registered Independent. The terrorists have been speaking out on the matter over the last few weeks. They are thrilled that the weaker party is now in power. We are in trouble.

Answer 10

The majority of Americans apparently didn't think so. Tell me where you saw them cheering and applauding?