Last week Bush was telling us that Rumsfeld would be with him until the end. When they asked him today about Rumsfeld resignation and if he knew it was going to happen, he said yes he knew, he just didn't want to tell anybody about it at the time. He has absolutely no crediblility whatsoever.
2006-11-08 13:44:37 · 21 answers · asked by Netta 3 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Why haven't we impeached the man yet? I thought that's what we did to lying presidents...
2006-11-08 13:47:25 · answer #1 · answered by Kodoku Josei 4 · 2⤊ 2⤋
How was that a lie? I don't get it. As far as we know, last week he didn't know when he answered that question. And so what if he did know, he obviously didn't want to let the cat out of the bag prior to the resignation being official. When he made that statement without an official resignation from Rumsfeld, as far as he know the guy was going to be with him until the end. And who is to say that this isn't "the end" he was talking about? Just get over yourself. The government is constantly changing. How many changes did Clinton have in his 8 years? I personally lost count. And that's just on the Interns he had cigars with.
2006-11-09 04:19:21 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
if the Reps. won, he stayed. Since the Dems won, Rumsfeld knew the scrutinty he faced and the losing battle he had by the Dems.
He would have had a heart attack from the stress and criticism of the Dems hatred for Bush.
2006-11-08 22:04:37 · answer #3 · answered by n9wff 6 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Honey, all politician's make their living on lying to the American people as some point. We just try to elect the ones that will lie the least. Yes, you caught Bush in a lie but even the best politicians lie just look at Bill Clinton. Very good president but he told a bold faced lie to the American people. Do I question Bill's credibility no I don't because I know he's a politics.
2006-11-08 22:18:44 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
The end came today when the voters cast their ballots.
If the vote had gone the other way, Rumsfeld would still have a job.
Wake up and smell the roses you young dumb moron.
2006-11-08 21:47:52 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 1⤋
Well, most of us knew about the credibility issue from day 1, when he claimed he would be a uniter, not a divider.
I don't know if there has EVER been a more divisive president than Bushie.
2006-11-08 21:46:21 · answer #6 · answered by powhound 7 · 5⤊ 3⤋
none,, he is burnt toast,, maybe he and Cheney will resign and let speaker Nancy Pelosi be interim president for two years,, or maybe they want their butts kicked every day,,, all day,,, to make positive decisions,, let the healing begin for America, Iraq and the world,, democracy in the USA has worked as a positive example,,, Democrats Rule!
2006-11-08 21:52:13 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 2⤋
YES BUSH IS A LIAR .....so is RUMSFELD , and Cheney is a phuckin' BIG BIG liar. They are crooks who are profiteering from the war
2006-11-08 21:47:17 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 2⤋
You don't concede an election. See Katherine Harris' comments in Fla.
2006-11-08 21:50:27 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 2⤋
I know him quite well for past two years, and i got too used to it.
2006-11-08 21:50:35 · answer #10 · answered by HOMER 3 · 1⤊ 2⤋