2006-11-08 13:30:20 · 6 answers · asked by Anonymous in Business & Finance ➔ Investing
Commies!!!! ROFLMAO!!!!! That made my night.
Well don't invest it in Oil, Defense, health care and whatever else the commies want to whine about.
Invest in MILK and Cookies (nabisco pretty good here) so incoming commie leader HILLARY will lay out for UBL, Chavez and those two other nitwits in Korea and Iran.
OPM the world will get better?????? Clinton orchestrated the biggest market crash not seen since 1929! when the bubble exploded millions were lost. Not to mention that he would rather bang an intern than take action on the USS Cole being blown halfway up. The democrats appease their enemies and it cost us DEARLY!
Muncie look again the commies just took control of the senate by one seat. That means they dominate the committies who write the dictatorship bylaws and refuse to conceed to the good people until 1. the troops are pulled out and the sooner the better (janunary) 2 Queen hillary serves milk and cookies in the rose garden to ubl, chavez and the two nitwits in iran and korea while slick willie is back banging interns in the oval office and the entire world makes them the laughing stock of the universe.
2006-11-08 13:53:40 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Stocks historically have done their best under periods of Democratic control and were weakest under Republican control.. Consider strongly the performance of the equity market since Jan. 20, 2001. When fees and taxes are taken out, the average investor has lost money since then as the market has only changed by 3.2% in nominal terms. Without taxes and fees that is only annualized return of 64/100ths of 1 percent per year return.
It is important to rember that conservatism is about maintaining the status quo. As such, things don't change much, including profits.
Liberalism derives its root from the word liberty and is about providing liberty to the largest number of people possible, which encourages entrepreneurism. Things change, not always for the better, but they change for the largest number of people possible. As an economist, democrats hold economically untenable positions, but so do the republicans. The present value of the Federal debt has grown so large, when "off the books" liabilities are included under GW that it now exceeds the present value of all privately held assets combined. In other words, if everyone who should be owed money would show up today and the government had to tax to get it, it would have to seize 100% of all property in the US AND people would still have to work to get out of debt.
On the other hand, it isn't as bad as its sounds as most of the debt is owed to Americans. The problem is, a very large portion is owed to the People's Republic of China. They could crush our economy if they went to war with us just by demanding a check. Of course that would destroy their economy, but some day, it won't.
You are not in the position you think you are in, so be happy, the world may get much better.
2006-11-08 22:28:00 · answer #2 · answered by OPM 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I guess you are not too much of a history student are you? First of all the "Communists" as you call them are not in control. It is more or less a dead lock. Too bad there was not a dead lock before the current Hitler desided to invade the current Poland.
Anyway the Communists are as easily bought as the the Fasists. Money talks, so I do not expect much difference.
2006-11-08 21:54:01 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Ignorant statement/question.
That's as smart as me believing all of the Christian Right in America are homosexual.
2006-11-09 00:13:37 · answer #4 · answered by Common Sense 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
What the... I don't get what the hell are you trying to talk about?
2006-11-08 21:42:11 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Get OUT of the market, quick !!!!!!
2006-11-08 21:37:27 · answer #6 · answered by Bill P 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋