Billions of dollars being "funded" for the study of global warming,(since Gore has repeatedly stated global warming is real, I don't see the need to further confirm it's existence, LOL, but most libs insist) or
Making darn sure our military and intelligence agencies are granted the budgets they require to ensure Americas safety?
2006-11-08 13:18:29 · 6 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Government
Adam, you avoid the question..................
2006-11-08 13:24:20 · update #1
Nothing but preachy pap.
At least the last respondent came close to an answer.
2006-11-08 13:48:31 · update #2
Democrats wanted to legalize gay marriages and abortion but they prioritize the improvement of the economy and welfare.
2006-11-08 13:21:30 · answer #1 · answered by FRAGINAL, JTM 7 · 3⤊ 1⤋
Global warming is far more important that so called "safety" proided by our military and the spies spying on their own people. None of that crap will matter a bit when the environment goes crazy, terrorists will be too busy trying to stay alive like everyone else.
2006-11-08 21:29:36 · answer #2 · answered by irongrama 6 · 4⤊ 0⤋
Well, without the environment, who are we going to savagely and needlessly drop our overpriced bombs on?
And how much money is needed to "make darn sure"our military has to search through garbage to outfit their troop trucks with armor or to "make darn sure" our intelligence agencies confirm Weapons of Mass Destruction that don't exist. Hell, man, I could have done those things for about $1.95.
Last time I checked, Americans are dying a lot more often than they would than if we weren't in Iraq. Or do our soldiers who die daily not count to you?
God Bless America, land of preemptive striking, xenophobia, and stubborn denial of the truth.
2006-11-08 21:33:06 · answer #3 · answered by kraikaikaigai? 2 · 4⤊ 1⤋
Well, lets see, the last time Democrats ran Congress there were 3,000 pork items, this year there were 14,000 ones, yep the Republicans sure know how to keep the money SAFE! NOT! They threw us in the RED further than we can see. We would have had a balanced budget in less than 10 years and now theres NO WAY, simply NO WAY! Yet you blame democrats?
Your an *ss!
2006-11-08 21:22:28 · answer #4 · answered by AdamKadmon 7 · 5⤊ 1⤋
Taking control of at least one house of Congress to piss you off so you ask outrageous questions, was their main priority.
We obviously need to fund our intelligence agencies considering the horrible job they did before we started the liberation of Iraq. Should we cut their budgets they will probably start telling us crazy things like terrorists are going to start showing up in our back yards.
2006-11-08 21:32:38 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 0⤋
Gradually reducing troops while financing the war as needed is the democrat plan. It will get us out of the war safely.
2006-11-08 21:21:00 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 1⤋