CENSORSHIP by Good Ole Dr. Pill! Who'da thought?

Question

http://bluemlein.blogspot.com/ - my friend sent me this link. My jaw dropped!

Read the blog and ask yourself why the Dr. Phil website would first publish the comment, then drop it? Could it possibly be that someone's nose was out of joint because of the last paragraph, which - in my opinion, at least - makes a valid point about the tenor of the show?

Answer 1

I think it was wrong for them to drop the comment.. It was very articulately written, no foul language, I was impressed by it. I would say that a comment posted on a site like that is purely for the expression of opinion. Why it was removed is not really a question.. They dont want people to broaden their thinking to that of your friends' thinking. What I didn't like about the show was that I had to rewind it (with the help of TIVO) to catch the part where he informs millions of people that the guy passed another independent lie detector test. I barely caught that, so I am quite positive a large number of people missed it as well.. I have my own opinions on the guys innocence.. But as far as the way the public was basically persuaded to believe the guilt, I dont think it was right.. By the way, your friend is amazing with words..