It was either not come in and bid my far well or possibly come in and injure a co-worker.
2006-11-08 11:11:12 · 6 answers · asked by Ivy 1 in Business & Finance ➔ Careers & Employment
excuse me? You should always give a two week notice if possible. A lot of companies will walk you out. If the company is ethical, they will pay you for the two weeks anyway.
Why would you injure a co-worker. Please explain.
2006-11-08 11:33:52 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
If you need a work reference from this place - and chances are that you will at some point - then you should give the standard two-week notice. Anything less than that is not considered good business practice.
Keep in mind that a future employer will probably want to know a lot about your previous employment. You always want to leave a company the proper way, if possible.
If you were afraid you'd injure someone if you went to work, then you have other problems that you need to resolve besides how to quit the job.
2006-11-08 19:44:31 · answer #2 · answered by mabbermabber 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Should you want to use the business as a reference now and in the future, it would be best to give a 1 to 2 week notice.
2006-11-08 19:19:45 · answer #3 · answered by Lore 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
It is always wise to do so. It's not necessary, but in the spirit of not burning bridges, it's a good thing to do. Most of the time, it will ensure you a good recommendation should you need it down the line some day.
2006-11-08 19:19:35 · answer #4 · answered by hollice70 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
you should always give a two week notice. you never want to burn you bridges. when other employers call to do varifications it can be used against you as giving no notice or not being rehirable.
2006-11-08 19:51:20 · answer #5 · answered by nina 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
COMMON PRACTICE.
ESP IF YOU NEED TO LIST THEM ON YOUR APPLICATION FOR NEW EMPLOYMENT.
2006-11-08 19:22:33 · answer #6 · answered by cork 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋