In the act of sex, as a man, in the normal (missionary) position, I've always thought the opening of the ladies whatsit is too low, requiring a slightly awkward shift in position to get things started.
Who else has thought this?
Wouldn't it be far more comfortable if it was shifted up around three inches in the direction of her belly button, so you could just get on and get on with it without having to lift her legs up.
I hope you don't mind me using the word whatsit - there may be children here...
2006-11-08 10:51:38 · 18 answers · asked by Anonymous in Family & Relationships ➔ Other - Family & Relationships
I guess that dogie style was the first position used. I have often thought that it would be better if there were easier access. Easier access could cause way too many problems-so God knew what he was doing.. In heated encounters this does not seem too be much of a problem since the legs fly up automatically.
2006-11-08 10:58:15 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
I definatly don't think it's in the wrong place at all. There are a lot of other things that sort of "fall into place' during missionary. It lines your bodies up so that your face to face, chest to chest, legs are intwined, etc...
I'm no guy, so I don't know for sure, but I think God did a great job with our body parts and perfecting that postition so that it feels it's best.
2006-11-08 10:55:14 · answer #2 · answered by Dr. Kat 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Just turn her around doggy style and the whatsit will be opposite of what it is in missionary.
2006-11-08 11:08:50 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Ah! but if that was the case we couldn't squeeze the life out of you when we are p****d off! :)
And another thing too...is if that where the case, there would be no use for all those other 100+ positions to give a go. :(
2006-11-08 14:33:35 · answer #4 · answered by debs1701 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
yea if your a child then you wouldnt be reading this anyway. sorry im trying not to laugh right now. whatsit X) lol nice thoughts man!
2006-11-08 11:04:27 · answer #5 · answered by shheeyya mann 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
The present location allows for pressure on the clitoris so it's enjoyable to the girl, too. I have a question of my own though, why is the playground, so close to the plumbing?
2006-11-08 10:59:19 · answer #6 · answered by nursesr4evr 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
That has to be the strangest question I've read in days. It's the way we're made, duh! Think about if it were where you've suggested, missionary would be about the only position that would work. Not to mention how would she urinate and menstruate? Stick a pillow under her butt and get over it.
2006-11-08 10:56:48 · answer #7 · answered by A 3 · 2⤊ 0⤋
I can't believe I actually thought about your question...but once I had imagined it where you would like it to be ... I couldn't stop laughing.. Wouldn't that be a little dangerous, you know ..someone that is clumsy, could get hurt by objects that poke out..around the house or wherever they were.
......................
2006-11-08 11:00:03 · answer #8 · answered by gemma 4 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Well if they gave you a mouth in your chest, you could remain as lazy as ever and reduce the amount of arm movement to feed your face ..... i.e. less distance for your buttered soldiers to go!
2006-11-08 11:00:02 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
no, cus the women shudnt b so lazy as not to lift herself up, and the women really shouldnt stay still during sex, so solve ur prob by goin with sum1 more active;)
2006-11-08 10:55:19 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋