2006-11-08 10:29:23 · 12 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
No. Congress would have blocked any of his misconceived attempts at anything. Like Bush now, he would've been a lame duck, which is why he preferred resignation rather than greater shame to his already tainted image.
In so many words, even if he hadn't resigned, he wouldn't have been able to do anything, so winning Congress is better.
2006-11-08 10:38:45 · answer #1 · answered by RivatricHistrionic 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Rumsfeld's resignation is a plus winning the Senate is BLISS
2006-11-08 18:33:10 · answer #2 · answered by miraclehand2020 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
hard call. Rumsfeld was really bad news. But winning the senate was sweet
2006-11-08 18:32:24 · answer #3 · answered by JS 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
You have'nt won the Senate Yet, hopefully Allen can pull it out but its not looking good.
2006-11-08 18:34:16 · answer #4 · answered by asmith1022_2006 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
who can say. But after all the Democrat whing and crying, they have have a hell of alot of action in the next two years or I'm voting straight Republican in 2008. They have talked the talk, now lets see em walk the walk.
2006-11-08 18:32:20 · answer #5 · answered by Meow the cat 4 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Not really !
Maybe certain policies will change by Congress, which could,
and should bring our true heroes home "ASAP" !
Still, let's hope the newly elected will do their part, and
turn this thing around ! Right ?
2006-11-08 18:43:25 · answer #6 · answered by Swamp T 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
not really,, nobody wants Cheney to have a vote..... Democrats need to control the senate
2006-11-08 18:39:42 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Lemme say this...changing the Sec of Defense is not going to change anything in Iraq. You watch.
2006-11-08 18:34:11 · answer #8 · answered by Squawkers 4 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Don is sadly out of politics for a little while
2006-11-08 18:34:55 · answer #9 · answered by -----JAFO---- 4 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Nope. They're both equal.
2006-11-08 18:30:15 · answer #10 · answered by kjhenkel 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋