3 wins for 2 stamps
after 6 wins you will have 4 stamps
the other way, after 6 wins, you will have 3 stamps.
2006-11-08 10:21:12
·
answer #1
·
answered by a_blue_grey_mist 7
·
2⤊
0⤋
3 wins = 2 stamps would mathematically give you the most stamps over time, as each win is 2/3 of a stamp vs 1/2 (2/3 > 1/2)
So, for 300 wins, you would get 200 stamps vs. 150 stamps
However, if you only win 2 games in the long run, you're better off with the 1 stamp than zero ;)
Best of luck!
2006-11-08 18:21:53
·
answer #2
·
answered by disposable_hero_too 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
3 wins=2 stamps will give u the most well because in the first one 2 wins=1 then it gives u 1/2 the second one give u 2/3 so its always the second one
2006-11-08 18:22:06
·
answer #3
·
answered by sexy_angel_0822 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
3 wins = 2 stamps.
If you used 2 wins to get 1 stamp, you would need 4 wins to get 2 stamps, which is more "expensive" than using 3 wins to get 2 stamps.
2006-11-08 18:25:32
·
answer #4
·
answered by Luken 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
3 wins = 2 stamps...based on 30 wins you'll have 20 stamps...with 2 for 1 you'll only have 15...and so on
2006-11-08 18:47:21
·
answer #5
·
answered by Rob B 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
2 wins=1 stamp because it takes longer to get three wins.
While someone else is making their third win you have started on your next 2=1 set. You can squeeze more of these into the same amount of time.
2006-11-08 18:22:10
·
answer #6
·
answered by jam_please 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
3=2. The ratio of the first option is 2:1, the ratio of the second option is 1.5:1, meaning you need slightly less wins with 3wins=2stamps, and you will gain stamps faster.
2006-11-08 18:22:17
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
they are pretty much equal because if you 2 wins you just have 1 stamp and if 3 wins you have 2 stamps so is equal !!
2006-11-08 18:27:59
·
answer #8
·
answered by cherry 2
·
0⤊
1⤋
3 wins=2 stamps i think that's wat ur asking
2006-11-08 18:21:05
·
answer #9
·
answered by dogy_16123 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
do both
2006-11-08 18:20:59
·
answer #10
·
answered by Pooblah 2
·
0⤊
1⤋