(1) The person who helps us conquer time? "science"
(2) The person who scores the winner? "sports"
(3) The person who portrays them on the silver screen? "jester"
2006-11-08 10:11:13 · 9 answers · asked by diSota 2 in Social Science ➔ Psychology
Obviously, the scientist.
Athletes are payed to play (emphasis) games that most people play as a hobby. Definitely not worthy of much money.
Acting is worth more than sports, but they give no actual contribution to the world.
Scientists are working for the embetterment of mankind. Granted, it could be argued that we will all inevitably die, and thus there is no use in advancing society, but just think of everything science has helped us do.
2006-11-08 10:20:57 · answer #1 · answered by BurningPyre 4 · 2⤊ 0⤋
1
2006-11-08 18:14:42 · answer #2 · answered by bjb 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Jester every time
2006-11-08 18:34:28 · answer #3 · answered by Concerned Citizen 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
(4) The person who blogs about them and writes questions on answer websites.
2006-11-08 18:19:31 · answer #4 · answered by Daniel T 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
I think that they should all make no money. But instead, each is given according to need, and each gives according to ability.
2006-11-08 18:20:05 · answer #5 · answered by commieguerilla 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
None of the above.
2006-11-08 18:14:35 · answer #6 · answered by idontknow 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
the science major.
2006-11-08 18:18:40 · answer #7 · answered by magnolia 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
science
2006-11-08 18:16:28 · answer #8 · answered by *BoNitA ChIcA* 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
none of the above...teachers should def. make a LOT more than they do.
2006-11-08 18:25:58 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋