I greatly prefer intact. My circumcised first boyfriend almost always had to finish by hand because of the decreased sensitivity, and that made me feel like I was no good to him. My husband is whole, and the sex is much, much more satisfying in every possible way. I suppose if I were madly in love with a man who had been done by his parents when he was a baby, I would have to learn to put up with it, but I'm really glad my husband's parents had the good sense to leave him the way nature made him. I think if I were with a guy and he suddenly decided he was so into pain and bodily mutilation that he just had to have it done, it would be a relationship breaker, because I wouldn't want to be with anybody that freaky.
The "bad smell" stuff is BS - a man just has to wash regularly, and there is no smell!
2006-11-09 06:13:18
·
answer #1
·
answered by Maple 7
·
2⤊
0⤋
Not circumcised. And not really
2006-11-08 18:05:14
·
answer #2
·
answered by ? 5
·
2⤊
0⤋
as a person marrried to someone for 19 not circumised i would say i prefred not cause they smell
2006-11-08 18:12:15
·
answer #3
·
answered by ? 5
·
0⤊
2⤋
Doesn't matter. I've been with guys that were and weren't.
2006-11-08 18:08:11
·
answer #4
·
answered by heavy6metal9babe 5
·
2⤊
0⤋
If your circumsized , you feel less pleasure.
So i would not get circumzised.
2006-11-08 18:06:08
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
0⤋
GERY, IT DOSEN'T MATTER WITH ME.
2006-11-08 18:04:58
·
answer #6
·
answered by tinkerbell 6
·
2⤊
0⤋
doesn't matter
2006-11-08 18:04:54
·
answer #7
·
answered by Wish 6
·
2⤊
0⤋