English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

i don't like big East but big east is still better than big-12. Texas's fans got some big mouths cuz they got lucky last year. The rest of the teams in that league are pure garbage. Rutgers would crush Texas if they played.

2006-11-08 09:15:57 · 5 answers · asked by Anonymous in Sports Football (American)

bowl records? who cares about that? what about national championships? Big-Ten owns them if you wanna get it started.

2006-11-08 09:26:11 · update #1

5 answers

u mean the weakest MAJOR conference?
Because there are several worse 1A conferences, the worst being the SUN BELT

2006-11-08 18:08:47 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

You know, a lot of folks say that, but over the past 5 years, the Big XII has THE best bowl record of all conferences.

Between OSU and Michigan, you're probably right. And, if that's your mark for "best conference", then the Big XII is no where near the bottom. The true test of conference strength, top to bottom, is how they fair against other conferences, in bowl games.

2006-11-08 09:24:14 · answer #2 · answered by Manny 6 · 1 0

the big 12 is okay better than like the big sky or whatever the mountain west but the big east is much better, but i think texas would beat rutgers, but well see, if rutgers beats west virginia and louisville, then i would give then a chance against texas, otherwise, not a shot

2006-11-08 09:18:32 · answer #3 · answered by milwaukee brewers 3 · 1 0

i'm gonna have to say the C-USA is pretty weak. or the WAC.

but i will say the big 12 is not that strong. baylor? colorado? kansas and k-state? almighty christ!

2006-11-08 11:12:26 · answer #4 · answered by loveholio 5 · 1 0

Moutain west is pretty bad.

2006-11-08 09:18:49 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

fedest.com, questions and answers