On just Proposition 87 in California , more than $140 millon was spent on both sides of the issue. Where did all of that money go?
~~~~~~ Why the money was spent , supposable~~~~~~~~
Californians, who already pay some of the highest gas prices in the country, were seen as reluctant to tack on another tax, even in the name of progress.
I understand not wanting more taxes but is that amount of money needed to have people figure it out?
2006-11-08
08:51:30
·
2 answers
·
asked by
Akkita
6
in
News & Events
➔ Other - News & Events
Proposition 87 appeared to be a tax on consumers to fund research into alternative energy sources. Los Angeles Times, which tends to lean left in its editorials, called Prop 87 "nutty" .
It wasn't so much this prop. so much as how the money was spent.
2006-11-08
09:10:29 ·
update #1