English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

If so, did you know that is exactly what terrorists want?

2006-11-08 07:23:56 · 15 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government Politics

15 answers

Of course they do, and they want the U.N. at the helm!

The United Nations actively pursues anti-American policies and appeases America's enemies, while being largely funded by $3 billion worth of annual American dues. After revealing the depth of rampant corruption in the UN, it is time to recognize the changes in Old Europe and redesign America's alliances that line up with America's national interests.

If John Kerry and Hillary Clinton have their way, Kofi Annan and Jacques Chirac will gain veto power over American foreign policy. Scared? You should be. It could happen. And in Inside the Asylum, former deputy undersecretary of defense Jed Babbin shows just how it could happen and why the UN deserves the nickname "The Asylum."

In the Asylum...

* the UN assists international terrorists. Babbin exposes the shocking links between the UN and terrorist organizations.

* The money trail from the UN to Saddam Hussein. It is time to rip the veil from the outrageous Oil-for-Food program-proving that the UN sold its moral legitimacy for oil, stuffed its own pockets at the expense of the Iraqi people, and undermined American pressure on Saddam Hussein: the UN's cash cow. The UN's Oil-for-Food program, provided Saddam Hussein with the means to bribe politicians, to deprive his people of needed food and medicine, and to literally steal billions of dollars. There is even emerging evidence that money from the program might have gone to support al-Qaeda.

• The UN's raid on the American Treasury: dominated by Third World staffers who consider the United States Treasury "the common heritage of mankind." Kofi Annan, the UN secretary-general, is an anti-American moral relativist who misses no opportunity to arrogate power from the United States to the UN.

* The United Nations and the European Union are morally bankrupt-and open enemies of the United States. France and the United Nations have cost American lives in Iraq by their perverse delaying of American action in the Iraq War. American troops are fighting and dying today because of a terrorist strategy Saddam Hussein developed while France and the United Nations delayed Operation Iraqi Freedom.

The UN is more of an international criminal than a dispenser of legitimate international law. If America wants to retain its sovereignty and security, it's time to escape from the UN asylum and say goodbye to the false friends of Old Europe. We owe no tribute to the UN and the EU, We should not be ashamed and divided to look after our own defense."

The United Nations building in Manhattan is an international enclave, no longer American territory. Inside the Asylum is a powerful argument that it's time to reclaim that land for America.

2006-11-08 07:26:23 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 3 3

It depends on what type of liberal we're talking about.

Liberalism is an ideology, and is usually applied to domestic politics.

In the study of international relations, International Liberalism is another thing entirely. It DOES count on the interdependence of nations in the global community. It counts on international law to govern that global community. It also believes in free trade throughout that global community.

The "libbies" of which you are referring are not necessarily for this. Liberalism as a domestic ideology focuses on social freedom and support, economic checks and balances, oversight on big corporations, etc. Liberalism as a domestic policy doesn't actually have anything to do with making a one world government.

As far as the terrorists wanting a one world government.. they actually just want everyone to think, act, and govern exactly as they do, following the Koran. Republicans seem to want everyone to think, act, and govern exactly as they do, following the Bible. If you're going to make gross exaggerations, that one is just as likely as the one you mention.

2006-11-08 07:31:53 · answer #2 · answered by feistycharley 3 · 0 1

really? the palestinian liberation organization wanted one world govt? hammas does? Bin Laden does???? the irish republican army did? what are you talking about?

even if all terrorists wanted something, would it be a bad thing necessarily? i'm sure all terrorists want to evacuate their bowels when full. is eliminating waste a bad thing, then?

2006-11-08 07:29:43 · answer #3 · answered by cassandra 6 · 1 0

So... am I know-how this wisely? God is utilizing Nibiru to convey about the end cases, which will take position in 2012? So the 7 years tribulation is happening now? So the antichrist is already in potential? So... perhaps the mark of the beast is a "God Bless u.s." bumpersticker. or perhaps a Jesus fish, having been preverted by the Deciever.

2016-11-28 22:26:39 · answer #4 · answered by cottom 4 · 0 0

who wants a one world govt? probably people that support cafta, the eu and people that are now supporting SPP. If you want to call those people terroroists, you should look up who they are first. They might get mad.

2006-11-08 07:36:18 · answer #5 · answered by . 4 · 1 1

the bilderbergs want a one world governement.

2006-11-08 07:30:02 · answer #6 · answered by New Foil Hat1134 3 · 2 0

YES THE UN

They will take our guns and freedom and redistribute our wealth to the world.

2006-11-08 07:36:29 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 2 2

Bush is the one that was turning us into an empire again.... or do you still believe Iraq was part of the war on terror?

2006-11-08 07:26:30 · answer #8 · answered by pip 7 · 3 3

yes, and the name of that world government

The UN

2006-11-08 07:26:23 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 4 2

Do you see another way to achieve world piece? or do you also see that as a ridiculous notion?

2006-11-08 07:29:51 · answer #10 · answered by ranger12 4 · 1 3

fedest.com, questions and answers