Dude, really try and get some help. You clearly have issues that need attending to. If you're gay or not, this silliness isnt healthy for you. Not passing judgment, but clearly this is a cry for help.
2006-11-11 10:22:01
·
answer #1
·
answered by imaginary friend 5
·
4⤊
0⤋
I highly doubt that animal homosexuality is the only excuse gays and lesbians have to defend themselves. There are a million other reasons.
They usually use that logic to show that homosexuality is not unnatural, for it occurs in the natural world. Now, not everything that is natural is right for humans (see: cannibalism, eating one's young, killing, urinating on personal property, etc.). That's why I really don't like this argument. Human beings have moved away from nature for the better, so let's stop using 'natural' as a starting place for human morality.
Make sense?
2006-11-08 08:37:43
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
1⤋
I don't like men in that way. I'm just not attracted in any way. I know that's hard to understand for many straight people. The only way I can think to explain it, is try feeling attracted to a man if you're straight. And there you'll have it. You just can't be attracted. It's not for any particular reason. It's just that you aren't able to. It's not that men are too masculine. It's just that they're men. And to me, it's just not possible to fall for one. There's no exact answer out there. And I know that no one will ever agree on one exact answer or agree that being Gay isn't a choice. It's just one of those things that we all have to agree to disagree upon even though we don't want to.
2016-05-21 22:28:09
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
It isn't advanced as a justification of homosexuality, it is a specific (and totally effective) counter for the wrong-headed view held by some confused souls that homosexuality is UNnatural. Showing its prevalence in a natural setting blows that right out of the water.
2006-11-08 09:42:51
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
Clearly it's as natural as being born with one arm because it occurs in nature, but it's not as normal as the standard of having two arms, or in this case, being attracted ot the opposite sex.
But they shouldn't be treated badly by society just because of their behavior just like no one who isn't born to the normal standard should.
By the way, not sure if anyone has proved that some animals are gay. I'd have to see evidence of an animal that only has sex with the same sex strictly. From what I've seen, they will have sex with the same sex only if they're really horny and no other opposite sex animal is around, like men in jail. But not all of those men are gay or bi for that matter.
2006-11-08 07:24:30
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
2⤋
The fact that it occurs in nature is the defense against the argument that it is unnatural. I am sorry that you seem to not be able to grasp the irony of that but perhaps if you studdied harder and maybe spent less time worrying about your hair you might be able to reason these things out for yourself.
Being Born homosexual is also natural but because most straights are unable to figure that if they where born straight we could be born homosexual we just have to point to nature.
2006-11-08 07:29:57
·
answer #6
·
answered by ♂ Randy W. ♂ 6
·
2⤊
1⤋
It feels good, it harms no one else, it's being true to yourself, it's living with the person you fall in love with, it's diverse, it doesn't add to an already overpopulated species, it doesn't cause any arguing over abortion, it's what we want, it's more sexually rewarding, there aren't any unwanted babies, it promotes adoption, and it doesn't need to be defended because it's nobody else's business. Are these "excuses" good enough?
2006-11-08 18:24:07
·
answer #7
·
answered by Rageling 4
·
1⤊
0⤋
Uhh, the fact that there are animals that show homosexual behavior is one of the arguments used by GLBT individuals to help prove that it is natural. It is NOT the sole "defense" used by any stretch of the imagination. Perhaps you could get out more to understand?
2006-11-08 07:24:06
·
answer #8
·
answered by gracious94 2
·
4⤊
0⤋
... what's that on your head? Never mind. I have never given the "excuse" you have written, and in fact I'm laughing at your stupidity as I type this. Personally for me it's a preference. I wanted to be gay, and I wouldn't change back. Some people like orange juice, others like apple juice. As I said, it's preference. Personally, I don't like your hair in your picture, but you do, so again, preference comes in.
I get that you're homophobic... and well, get over it. I have.
Big Kiss *MWAH* :P
2006-11-08 09:23:14
·
answer #9
·
answered by i_am_nathan_2002 3
·
0⤊
1⤋
This is mentioned when bigots (such as yourself) bring up the mistaken point that "being gay is not natural" or "God doesn't make gay things."
The same people usually go on to say that LGBT people aren't "natural" since they can't have children, blithely ignoring medical IVF advances and cruelly slamming barren couples.
I've given up trying to rationalize the hatred of such people. I just hope they don't have the gall to call themselves "christians."
2006-11-08 08:02:00
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
1⤋