But of course I see them here everyday criticizing our way of living saying that we are liberals, but yet still stay here because there country is not advanced enough to provide them with enough money to survive and they are still blaming us while they want our standard of living. But I guess that is what you get when you have a lot of ignorant people, and religious fanatics that cannot ameliorate their country on their own because they are too close minded, then they come here to hate a modernize civilization, and they still want to remain barbarians.
2006-11-08 06:41:15
·
answer #1
·
answered by Halal Pig Ok in Islam 4
·
4⤊
0⤋
The Arab international places are making plans now, so as that they could have greater then basically Palestinians scuffling with now. the single situation that the Arabs are taking area in is worldwide interest on the profession of Palestinians human beings. What particularly sickens me is that the media does no longer provide any training and it has no longer possibly for the 60 years of the profession. it relatively is going to basically provide the Israelis fringe of the story, leaving out the main factors of what particularly brought about the situation interior the 1st place. quickly Israels basically pal is the U. S., yet even with each and every thing the money that the U. S. spends on Gaza being rebuilt gets wreck back. At this factor no counties are allowed in Gaza without Israeli approval. Why might Israel choose different counties gaining awareness of the situations there? Any reporter or humanitarian worker that is going into Gaza will look down on the Zionist government a lot that they might dedicate something of their existence in speaking out for Gaza. this is a none certainty that any reporter that is going into Gaza is unhurt via the Palestinians, yet now and back they get arrested or killed via Israeli infantrymen. this is a certainty basically for persons who're uncovered to the certainty of the situation. while you're caught on only one style of media, then you certainly must be brainwashed via them. Israel does no longer choose this, because of the fact of this no newshounds are aloud in. different than for those reporter that are Zionist.
2016-10-15 13:03:13
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
They see the freedom they can have by living amongst the Western civilization and want it, the thing they don't want is to live with us peacefully and in harmony.
It seems as if we must conform to them rather then them learning to live in a society that has structure, something they are not use to.
The UK is no different with their do gooders as the Americans are. We need to shut those borders and take care of our own first and foremost.
It's hypocrisy at it's finest.
2006-11-08 06:33:53
·
answer #3
·
answered by ? 4
·
6⤊
0⤋
I have always wondered that. They hate the West for all we have done in the name of progress, yet they want to live here, & use all of the high technology they supposedly hate against the people who welcomed them into our countries??
I think the people from the Southern hemisphere should go back & stay there. (sorry to the good countries below the equator, you *know* I don't mean you!)
2006-11-08 06:26:43
·
answer #4
·
answered by fairly smart 7
·
6⤊
0⤋
Well, I would presume that MOST muslims immigrate to other countries becuase theirs are crap. Second, the vast majority of those, like other immigrants are simply average joes (or mohamed's in this case) simply trying to do better for themselves.
Just like all immigrant groups, you get a share of criminal and obnoxious people.
And, yes, there are some militants that go to the US, UK, etc. I'm sure those radicals are moving simply to foment problems in the new country and start some "mischief"
2006-11-08 06:24:04
·
answer #5
·
answered by dapixelator 6
·
5⤊
1⤋
They want to take over the world and set up a Islamic
regime.
2006-11-08 06:32:08
·
answer #6
·
answered by Vagabond5879 7
·
5⤊
0⤋
They do not want to just live among us. They want to convert us or kill us, until the entire world is Islamic. It is in their writings and speeches.
That is my view of the "radicals" and not necessarily all Muslims.
Sue
2006-11-08 06:24:13
·
answer #7
·
answered by newbiegranny 5
·
11⤊
0⤋
Because they get free stuff and live better.
UK is buying into secular progression (live and let live with no standards). Which is exactly where we're heading.
2006-11-08 06:24:59
·
answer #8
·
answered by baby1 5
·
7⤊
0⤋
One word: DOLE;
Where else but in the the U.K. and France can a radical emmigrate, and get paid to do absolutely nothing but plan jihad against his host country.
And THAT is exactly what is happening...Couple that together with dwindling demographics of native europeans and a explosion in the birth rate of the muslim immigrants and you see quickly why Islamic radicals seek to destroy from within the culture and the people that most offend them. RIGHT IN THIER OWN BACKYARD!
Today, a fearless Muslim advance has penetrated far deeper into Europe than Abd al-Rahman. They're in Brussels, where Belgian police officers are advised not to be seen drinking coffee in public during Ramadan, and in Malmo, where Swedish ambulance drivers will not go without police escort. It's way too late to rerun the Battle of Poitiers. In the no-go suburbs, even before the french current riots, 9,000 police cars had been stoned by ''French youths'' since the beginning of the year; some three dozen cars are set alight even on a quiet night. ''There's a civil war under way in Clichy-sous-Bois at the moment,'' said Michel Thooris of the gendarmes' trade union Action Police CFTC. ''We can no longer withstand this situation on our own. My colleagues neither have the equipment nor the practical or theoretical training for street fighting.''
What to do? In Paris, while ''youths'' fired on the gendarmerie, burned down a gym and disrupted commuter trains, the French Cabinet split in two, as the ''minister for social cohesion'' (a Cabinet position I hope America never requires) and other colleagues distance themselves from the interior minister, the tough-talking Nicolas Sarkozy who dismissed the rioters as ''scum.'' President Chirac seems to have come down on the side of those who feel the scum's grievances need to be addressed. He called for ''a spirit of dialogue and respect.'' As is the way with the political class, they seem to see the riots as an excellent opportunity to scuttle Sarkozy's presidential ambitions rather than as a call to save the Republic.
In defiance of traditional immigration patterns, these young men are less assimilated than their grandparents. French cynics like the prime minister, Dominique de Villepin, have spent the last two years scoffing at the Bush Doctrine: Why, everyone knows Islam and democracy are incompatible. If so, that's less a problem for Iraq or Afghanistan than for France and Belgium.
If Chirac isn't exactly Charles Martel, the rioters aren't doing a bad impression of the Muslim armies of 13 centuries ago: They're seizing their opportunities, testing their foe, probing his weak spots. If burning the 'burbs gets you more ''respect'' from Chirac, they'll burn 'em again, and again. In the current issue of City Journal, Theodore Dalrymple concludes a piece on British suicide bombers with this grim summation of the new Europe: ''The sweet dream of universal cultural compatibility has been replaced by the nightmare of permanent conflict.'' Which sounds an awful lot like a new Dark Ages.
The echoes can be heard in many neighborhoods of north and east London, where Sajid Sharif, 37, a trained civil engineer who goes by the name Abu Uzair, once handed out incendiary leaflets preaching his brand of extreme Islam. From the comfort of his home, he leads the Savior Sect, a group that claims several hundred supporters and seeks to unite all Muslims worldwide under a strict conception of Islamic law. That might seem fanciful--except that Uzair's mentor, Omar Bakri Muhammad, was one of the first clerics to lose his right to live in Britain under the new antiterrorism laws. He was barred from returning after a holiday abroad. Uzair says he isn't concerned about the threat of eviction because he is British born, and his lawyer has reportedly told him he has little to worry about. "Anyway," says Uzair, "it is all in the hands of Allah."
Uzair is bearded, wears a long white gown and quotes nonstop from the Koran and Hadith (a collection of the teachings of the Prophet Muhammad). His Pakistani parents are secular Muslims, he says, and speak very little English. In his youth he smoked and went to night clubs. It was not until he was a university student in Britain that he embraced Islam. "I wanted some inner discipline," he says. "Since I have come to Islam, I have a lot of tranquillity." Now he tries to steer people away from drugs, drink, crime and smoking. Uzair's supporters refuse to vote in elections because his sect recognizes only Shari'a, Islamic law. While he does not openly support terrorism, he declares that the July 7 attacks were retaliation for Britain's support of the wars in Afghanistan and Iraq. "The majority of Muslims in the U.K. are frustrated, but they cannot speak," he says. "They will not condone the London bombings, but inside they believe that Britain had it coming."
Source(s):
MARK STEYN SUN-TIMES COLUMNIST
&
http://www.time.com/time/magazine/articl...
Generation Jihad
Western Muslims' Racist Rape Spree
http://www.frontpagemag.com/articles/rea...
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/eurabia#the...
2006-11-08 06:24:17
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
7⤊
1⤋
Because they look to conquer the West and kill the infidels.
they are disgusting.
2006-11-08 06:24:42
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
8⤊
0⤋