I take heat every day for my voicing displeasure with Rumsfeld.
Now he's gone.
To fight a war with moderation is imbecilic, and to me, almost criminally negligent. That he's allowed a number of our troops to be tried for "war crimes" based on the "testimony" of the enemy, is the worst example of leadership I've seen since Clinton.
Make no mistake, Rumsfeld did give our military back it's honor after Hillary neutered them, but since then he's left our soldiers to languish by not allowing them to fight.
My question is:
Will the dems permit our troops to put down the Sadam loyalists and Sadar's Mhadi Army, or will they demand that America declare defeat?
2006-11-08 05:14:44 · 5 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Speak of washed perception with an avatar of a dictator? Sorry comrade.
2006-11-08 05:22:39 · update #1
During the 90's, Hillary cut the military budget to fund her social engineering programs. You were probably watching the Mighty Morphin Power Rangers and don't remember.
I do.
2006-11-08 05:32:52 · update #2
they will demand the total surrender of the United States Armed Forces. not only this they will hold more people "accountable" for "war crimes" and vote to apply Geneva convention rights to the terrorists.
2006-11-08 05:23:07 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
How could Hillary nueter the army? Thats absurd.
It was supposed to be a quick invasion, find the "WMD"s, set up puppet government and get out. There was no support for an all out invasion and occupation lasting years.
Dont try and twist it around and blame the democrats.
You can see by the election results, the American people don't like the war in Iraq.
Our troops dying over there to bring"freedom" to the Iraqi people is a joke. Tell me where's the freedom. Now they have death squads to worry about. Its a bloodbath over there for the Iraqi people.
Now Bechtel is pulling out because they cant keep their people safe. We can't count on the national gaurd for troop strength and supplying the army.
Bush stepped in it. There is no honor in this mess.
2006-11-08 13:23:35 · answer #2 · answered by Thurston Howell III 4 · 0⤊ 1⤋
black or white.. just like most republicans.. there are many more options and the democrats are willing to look at them, unlike the tunnel vision neocons
2006-11-08 13:18:09 · answer #3 · answered by pip 7 · 0⤊ 1⤋
I can't even be bothered arguing with you as you are obviously brainwashed.
2006-11-08 13:18:41 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
Whoa dude, reality check!!!!
2006-11-08 13:16:43 · answer #5 · answered by Wounded duckmate 6 · 0⤊ 1⤋