or get really sick ????
isn't it time to change the laws which were done by old ladies ???
do u agree or not that the maximun time a person should be in the supreme court of justice should be not more than 15 years or maybe 10 ???
2006-11-08 05:09:51 · 4 answers · asked by game over loves evanescence 6 in Politics & Government ➔ Law & Ethics
one of the reason why i think this should be done is to ensure the mental capacity and to make sure the law goes according to the times .
2006-11-08 10:08:13 · update #1
No, the law is fine. You don't bring up a single point that shows why it should be changed.
2006-11-08 05:14:17 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
I think they should be limited to a set number of years as well. It will keep new ideas and fresh mind in place.
2006-11-08 13:21:00 · answer #2 · answered by bratty brat 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
agreed, i never understood this whole life time appointment thing, it makes for bad decisions and worse laws
2006-11-08 13:17:48 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
better than really young people who can only be taken out if they die....
2006-11-08 13:17:32 · answer #4 · answered by Ms. Switch 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋