English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Just because more Americans haven't been killed in a terrorist attack since 9/11 doesn't mean Bush has done ANYTHING to stop it from happening again. Killing innocent civilians in Iraq will only create more, and from a country that none of the 9/11 hijackers came from! Wow, more enemies! Republicans don't discourage terrorism, our troops do, and Bush doesn't fund 'em! Now, we can grab Osama!

2006-11-08 04:58:22 · 28 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government Politics

28 answers

hey people there is nothing called ben laden he is over
u are living in ghost his name is ben laden
and who made u live in this scary story ( bush )
to serve his objectives for getting money from American people to support his war in Iraq for oil

2006-11-08 05:02:20 · answer #1 · answered by micho 7 · 1 2

Well actually , the Dem's have promised to pull the funds for Iraq and the war on terror , so if there are NO troops ,how do you plan on catching anyone....
"[W]hen Pressed On How He Could Stop The War Even If Democrats Control The House During The Last Years Of President Bush's Second Term, Rangel Paused Before Saying, 'You've Got To Be Able To Pay For The War, Don't You?'" New York Post Said Rep. Rangel's Proposal "[W]ould Leave America's Fighting Forces High And Dry ..." New York Post, 9/27/06)

New York Post: "What a terrific message to be sending Osama & Co. It's an engraved invitation to kill as many Americans as possible between now and Nov. 7, in hopes that Charlie Rangel and the rest of the anti-war nogoodniks carry the day at the polls." (Editorial, "Charlie's Plan To Stab The Troops," New York Post, 9/27/06)
New York Post: "What about the tens of thousands of soldiers and Marines now in harm's way? Rangel's leaving them twisting slowly in the wind: Why take risks in the War on Terror today, if Charlie and his friends intend to sabotage the effort tomorrow?" (Editorial, "Charlie's Plan To Stab The Troops," New York Post, 9/27/06)
On The Same Day Story Came Out, Rep. Rangel Voted Against Defense Appropriations:

2006-11-08 05:11:16 · answer #2 · answered by bereal1 6 · 1 0

Well because liberals don't do anything to even attempt to slow terrorism much less stop it. YOUR boy Bill had three chances to catch UBL --two times he KNEW what HOUSE he was in. The other time he KNEW his flight plan. What did Bill do to stop 9/11? And you say nothing, boys and girls?

About that killing innocent civilians. How many more are killed by the terrorist than are killed by US troops?

2006-11-08 05:12:26 · answer #3 · answered by namsaev 6 · 1 0

Finally...
Someone making sense.
Everyone forgets how easily anthrax was put in the mail or how simple it was for John Malvo to kill and wound the people of Maryland and Virginia. We have not been hit because they have not truly tried to hit us since 9/11. They set out to completely change America and succeeded when Bush enacted two wars, the PATRIOT Act, anal probes in airports, phone taps, and credit checks to buy cheese burgers.
Meanwhile Osama and the rest of the Al Quida lot are doing the exact same thing they were doing on September 10th 2001. Running from the law, living in caves, and making videos for Al Jah-Zeerah.

2006-11-08 05:10:44 · answer #4 · answered by gatewlkr 4 · 0 1

The Republicans want people to think that their fascism is the only way to protect America. In fact all they are doing is lining their own pockets and geting a stranglehold on power while the stupid public looks on blinded by the big business repub owned media.

2006-11-08 06:16:59 · answer #5 · answered by airmonkey1001 4 · 0 0

Well, I have thought about this, and have decided that humans, as a group, are basically too lazy to do the work to find out the truth themselves, and are too tribal to even internally question what their "leadership" is force feeding them.

But being lazy is in the genetic code (necessary to limit caloric expenditure), and being a follower is also in the genetic code. Only those of our ancestors who had that coding were the ones that survived to pass their genes to us.

But the question is: Is this the best we can do with that legacy?

2006-11-08 05:26:25 · answer #6 · answered by finaldx 7 · 0 0

Yep, RA suggested it quite stable. enable's settle for it, once you have lots of on the government dole people who're working have become the quick end. Liberalism is a ailment this is starting to be. that's pushing in the direction of socialism. human beings don't comprehend that with a view to have a colourful economic equipment human beings would desire to make contributions returned to society. i in my opinion hate the word creative, each and all of the extra youthful human beings in college use this time era. That and extra investment. it variety of feels that the subsequent technology is popping out with this me ismm mentality that's all would desire to be equivalent. One they get a job and could possibly no longer save it or in the event that they do, get taxed 70% of their earnings matbe they'll awaken. Conservatism is strictly the way it somewhat is defined. keeping extremely decrease priced. possible no longer make all human beings happy yet Conservatives do no longer care to make all human beings pleased with freebies. It additionally potential get a job and stale welfare.

2016-10-21 11:50:10 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Where do they get the idea? From Rush and friends. The whole truth is just too much for ditto heads it was so easy to let Rush do the thinking for them. There are and always have been conservative centerist Democrats and not all Dems have ever been ultra liberal leftys. A shaded concept apparently too difficult for them to get their heads around.

2006-11-08 05:03:51 · answer #8 · answered by justa 7 · 1 2

Said it once, and I will say it again. Repulicans have no room to talk, considering Bush was in business with the Bin Laden family. Republicans have short attention spans. They better increase their short term memories before starting this mud slinging contest.

2006-11-08 05:02:05 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 1 2

I wanted to thank all of the Republicans for their well thought out and logically presented arguments answering this question.

2006-11-08 05:08:54 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

Lets hope we can make a positive out of a negative here and begin to heal the middle east .

2006-11-08 05:02:51 · answer #11 · answered by playtoofast 6 · 0 1

fedest.com, questions and answers