English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Do you think that cartoons made decades ago should be censored to make them more politically correct by today's standards?

Certain sterotypical portrayals of minorities (blacks as servants, American Indians as savages, etc) bother some who feel they perpetuate the stereotypes and are outraged by the images. Others may feel that they are so outdated and exaggerated as to be harmless.

What about violent scenes in those same cartoons? Should they be cleaned up, as some have suggested?

What are your thoughts? Should Bugs Bunny and friends be censored?

2006-11-08 04:35:12 · 12 answers · asked by apocalypso blues 5 in Entertainment & Music Polls & Surveys

To clarify, I mainly mean editing to remove the questionable parts. I don't mean take them out of circulation completely.

2006-11-08 04:36:46 · update #1

12 answers

no

2006-11-08 04:37:17 · answer #1 · answered by anitababy.brainwash 6 · 1 0

Fox is presented nationally to each physique with a television in the time of primetime, on a similar time as comic strip community's block grownup Swim is on cable and shown after 11 pm. On Fox, there's a lots wider risk of offending somebody than there is on grownup Swim, so Fox does not take and possibilities and censors something it particularly is purely too offensive.

2016-10-03 10:17:26 · answer #2 · answered by schnetter 4 · 0 0

Also remember that smoking can often be seen in those old cartoons as well.

I think they shouldn't be censored, but maybe not shown to small children if they are full of those stereotypes. Remember also that cartoons were actually meant for adult audiences and were shown before movies. They weren't written for children early on.

2006-11-08 04:38:29 · answer #3 · answered by JIMBO 4 · 3 0

absolutely not this ignorance has already caused my fave speedy gozales to be taken off the air completely. if you censor art and cartoons are you're opening a flood gate the same narrow thinking has already caused some great literature to be taken out of circulation ( tom sawyer, huck finn) if you don't like it dont read it but leave me to choose for myself.......to hell with P.C. i don't need protection from thinking.

2006-11-08 04:41:06 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 3 0

Nothing's wrong with those great cartoons...

They are so funny and full of life... will You censor life too !??
Of course there is a lot of cruelty and violence --- but why not !? This is no kindergarten-stuff, these cartoons a genius --- but they are made for ADULT PEOPLE... not for kids. Why censorship !!!??

You will make me very angry !!! And if I am ANGRY I change into .... guess WHO !? You must know.....

Just kidding... huge kiss from Viktoria.

PS.: And forget about censorship...

("JIMBO" said it already --- "witchway" too.... )

2006-11-08 04:43:23 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

I need 2 clarify sumthin' first. What did ya hav 4 breakfast?!!! Obviously, WB cartoons shudn't b censored. Y in da world shud they?!!!

2006-11-08 05:09:15 · answer #6 · answered by Sk8erGurl 3 · 0 1

I hadn't noticed the portrayals of minorities in a bad light. Violence is what disturbs me. They convey the idea that a person could actually survive having an anvil drop on their head or falling off of a cliff. That kind of thing.

2006-11-08 04:41:28 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 1 2

No- the classics reflect what society condoned at that time... i sort of time capsule....plus if you aren't intelligent enough to realized that they are cartoons you have bigger problems that political correctness. Plus I love it when the coyote falls off the cliff and doesn't realized it till he looks down.....

2006-11-08 04:42:08 · answer #8 · answered by witchway 2 · 4 0

NEVER!!!...

I don't think TimeWarner would like to hear that!

2006-11-08 04:40:17 · answer #9 · answered by bigmonty91010 5 · 2 0

Absolutely NOT.....

2006-11-08 04:40:52 · answer #10 · answered by bobemac 7 · 2 0

fedest.com, questions and answers