George is still not happy that he didn't take over Iraq like his dad failed to do as well. He basically said on the day he was sworn in that he would complete his dad's undone task in Iraq - and amazingly as soon as we were attacked (not by Iraq) - he immediately went to Saddam. I think he would've gone after him if it were anyone's fault - It could've been the Japanese and he'd have blamed Saddam.
2006-11-08 04:31:35
·
answer #1
·
answered by Been there 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
bush will leave Iraq after they take all the oil; they started steal ling and taking millions of tanks since Saddam was caught; he will leave it without thinking that Iraqi's will be left without a president; they have lots of differences between them; they can never be united; and lots of problems will happen; but bush also is not thinking about the American army; he just doesn't care as long he gets enough oil to America and Israel;;;; that's too bad that there are many people getting killed every day from both sides...
2006-11-08 04:37:17
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
it incredibly is what we've been advised: George W. Bush and his administration legitimately believed Saddam Hussein grew to become right into a valid possibility (some erroneous concept that he had WMDs) and sought to do away with him. it incredibly is what could have incredibly befell: George W. Bush and his administration mandatory some thing from Iraq, in all likelihood oil. so as that they fabricated evidence that Saddam had WMDs and grew to become into hence available, and used that as justification for the invasion. Or, in all likelihood, Bush felt an impossible to resist could desire to settle an outdated pink meat his kin had with Saddam. i would be effortless, i even have not got each and every of the data so each and every of the above is in simple terms hypothesis. this entire factor all started while i grew to become into some distance too youthful to comprehend politics, and because then lots counsel (and incorrect information) has surfaced related to the wars that i can't be useful of what to have faith. the only human being who understands for useful is G.W. Bush himself.
2016-12-17 06:26:23
·
answer #3
·
answered by ? 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
Bush can't admit he has made a mistake. More people have died in the war than in 9/11. I cannot believe after this many years we are still over there "fighting the good fight". It seems like our soldiers are over there for nothing, just waiting for a bomb to kill or injure them. It is really, really sad. I am sooooooo glad Bush cannot be elected again.
2006-11-08 04:29:33
·
answer #4
·
answered by jonesin_am 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
We are killing the bad guys in Iraq. There is a lot going on that you do not know about. So, it was no mistake to invade Iraq. I think that you are not educated enough to make this kind of question on the net. By the way I find your "I hate crackers" to be offensive.
2006-11-08 04:31:51
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
1⤋
I agree it was Bush. Lots of good Republican's lost their jobs yesterday due to him. He is the cowboy dictator...if you saw him at his press conference today, he truly had his tail between him legs.
2006-11-08 10:24:24
·
answer #6
·
answered by Sharon H 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
waiting 4 complete destruction.
2006-11-08 04:48:43
·
answer #7
·
answered by malika 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
shut up...first off we are there liberating them from Hussein. we did find the WMDs just later than we expected, and we WOULD leave if Iraq qould step up and show us we can in fact leave them better off than when we arrived.
2006-11-08 04:29:50
·
answer #8
·
answered by jefferson 5
·
1⤊
0⤋
You're such a weak loser, Bush's daughters could kick your ***. What's with your nickname by the way? Are you a racist piece of ****** ****?
2006-11-08 04:29:45
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋
I don't know. It's time to come home.
And I REALLY hate Hersheys. ;)
2006-11-08 04:31:48
·
answer #10
·
answered by profile image 5
·
0⤊
1⤋