Don't you find it insulting that Bush refused to include the Democrats for 6 years and now feels the need to start kissing butt? Watch what he says in his speech later about bi-partisanship. Where was that sentiment when he had control of the House and Senate? Is he afraid that he and his henchmen will be investigated?
2006-11-08 03:54:46 · 14 answers · asked by jack b 3 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
he should have included them all along yes.. but now he has no choice.. the people have spoken and the government has to work together or fall apart.. if he didn't work with the dem's now it would be true political suicide.
2006-11-08 03:57:30 · answer #1 · answered by pip 7 · 4⤊ 1⤋
This is a repeating part of his strategy. He does something to make it sound like he's a nice guy, and his supporters give him credit for being magnanimous or wise or whatever. Then he acts as if he never said it. It's a twist on the No Child Left Behind Act which put testing and program requirements on the states and then was not funded. Another examples is his road map for peace in the Middle East,
2006-11-08 11:57:50 · answer #2 · answered by Snowshoe 3 · 2⤊ 2⤋
No, it's the other way around after six years of democrat obstructionism ,Pelosi said she wants to promote by- partisanship. She wouldn't play all those years when someone else won but now that she's winning she wants to play. Just like a liberal your either with me or I don't want to play any more.
2006-11-08 12:02:54 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 2⤋
Maybe its just me but I would never vote to power a man who cant speak his own language properly.. I understand having problems with a foreign language but how can he say stuff like 'misunderestimate'? So I never expect anything intelligent or anything with longterm positive benefits from Bush.
2006-11-08 12:03:37 · answer #4 · answered by keg 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Umm, no.
Why, if you have control of the Congress would you need to "kiss butt" with an out-of-power party?
As for "bi-partisanship," liberal Democrats think bi-partisanship is when a Republican votes their way...but a Democrat (Joe Lieberman for example) is a traitor when he votes the way of a Republican.
2006-11-08 11:58:00 · answer #5 · answered by kingstubborn 6 · 1⤊ 3⤋
He is a gracious man who ALWAYS wanted to work with the Democrats. They were just too whiny. Hope they will settle down and WORK.
2006-11-08 11:59:06 · answer #6 · answered by E LIB o NATOR 2 · 2⤊ 3⤋
You're right. Bush needs to confront the Dems, not reconcile.
2006-11-08 11:57:25 · answer #7 · answered by Uncle Pennybags 7 · 2⤊ 3⤋
Of course Pelosy will try her best to get rid of President Bush he stands for every thing she hates....
1. Abortion at the last trimester
2. stem cell research from harvested embryos
And those are only two of her agendas
2006-11-08 11:59:33 · answer #8 · answered by TRUE GRIT 5 · 0⤊ 4⤋
absolutely.
Now that the Cowboy Pres has lost his horse he feels the need to include others in running the country.
King George has lost his country.
2006-11-08 11:56:43 · answer #9 · answered by RustyOwls 3 · 1⤊ 3⤋
Investigated for what?
2006-11-08 11:56:42 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 2⤋