definition of co leader?

Answer 1

someone who leads with someone else. "co" to me means that there are at least two people involved. so if its co-leader, then there are two leaders.

Answer 2

Co-leader

Answer 3

co-leader is a a defination of second leader in Clash of Clans.

Answer 4

Co-Leader

It does mean the (Fellow leader) or the leader's vice.

Answer 5

What do you mean? A leader of a company?

Or the likes of King William III and Queen Mary II -- of England?

Or .... ????

Answer 6

you do not make sense moon .you say 2 than u say 2 or more ,that is wrong co means 2

Answer 7

For the best answers, search on this site https://shorturl.im/avcwX

My definition of evil: Good and Evil are human perceptions... they are subjective concepts based on cultural norms... We place the label of 'Evil' on acts that we (as a culture) don't like, but if we, as a culture, consider something to be beneficial, then we label it as 'good'. Examples: some historic cultures used to sacrifice children to the gods and this was considered a good act, not an act of evil; England and America used to practise the barbaric act of slavery and, at the time, this was culturally normal and not considered to be evil by most people.. today most people consider it an evil practise for good reason; I consider George Bush to be evil, but many people consider him to be their saviour against the evil of Bin Laden & Co; Bin Laden and his followers believe that they are righteous and doing God's good work.. obviously most people (especially non muslims) don't agree with this view point. So Good and Evil are all subjective, and can only be defined by the person giving the label. They are not absolute terms. There are some behaviours and acts that almost everyone would term as extremely 'immoral'. These behaviours or acts might be labelled as 'evil'. We might label the people who commit these acts as 'evil' people, because they commit what we consider to be 'evil' acts. Examples of what we consider to be extreme immoral acts are serial child murder or child abuse... but, again, this labelling is a decision that is reached by a consensus of the majority of the population.. 'evil' is not an absolute term, it is a consensus. For instance, in some societies, old and present, it is normal for people to marry children. So where do are 'morals' come from? They come from our family and our society and are instilled in us to protect the whole society. (for instance, Jesus & Mohamed & Buddha taught a moral code to their followers to live by, probably because they felt a deep love for their fellow man/woman and wanted to make people's lives better... these moral codes have been used ever since by many different people and peoples mainly to control societies or to make societies better places to live). But here is another definition of evil that could be considered: the act of purposefully & knowingly inflicting misery, suffering or pain on others purely for a person's own gain, when there are other options or other choices that could be made. but then we can also inflict suffering on others by our actions due to ignorance, confusion and denial. at what point does evil kick in? does is kick in at ignorance, at confusion, at denial or at purposeful & willful acts? in other words, if we inflict suffering onto others because of our own purposeful actions, are we evil if we are ignorant that our actions cause harm to others? are we evil if we suffer from confusion and we think that our actions cause some suffering to somebody but we are told it is the right & normal thing to do and we don't know the best way forward so we do it anyway? are we evil if we know that our actions affect others but we say to ourselves (or our society says to us) that it doesn't matter and we carry on anyway? And are we all guilty of evilness? i'm think about our everyday actions or inaction that have an impact on people around the world i.e. contributing to global warming, using toxic chemicals, allowing our leaders to declare wars, buying non-organic food, buying products from manufacturers that support oppresive regemes etc. Its a big subject which provokes a lot of thought, discussion and debate... thanks for the question! zag :-)