The winner doesn't ask for a recount. The loser does.
2006-11-08 03:12:55
·
answer #1
·
answered by Nunya B 4
·
8⤊
1⤋
Boy talk about ignorance when they don't understand this question. Anyone with common sense knows all the past elections how the dems went on a rampage for recount after recount after recount.
Shoe's on the other foot too, and rightfully so!
2006-11-08 11:15:09
·
answer #2
·
answered by patrioticpeladac 4
·
1⤊
3⤋
No but I notice that George Allen the Republican in VA will probably ask for a recount.
2006-11-08 11:13:01
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
6⤊
1⤋
Let's see whos asking ,when the Dems. take the 2 outstanding aenate seats.
2006-11-08 11:19:18
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
I think there will be recounts in some senate races...maybe the supreme court will stop them
2006-11-08 11:13:25
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
1⤋
Where should they?
Is there evidence of vote fraud anywhere?
In the case of razor-thin margins, recounts are mandated by state law, so there's no need to ask.
2006-11-08 11:12:09
·
answer #6
·
answered by kreevich 5
·
5⤊
1⤋
I thought Republicans should ask for recount.
2006-11-08 11:13:24
·
answer #7
·
answered by slimshady3in 4
·
1⤊
4⤋
You're right! Now it's the neo-con's turn...
Except for the fact that Americans actually, finally, got tired of the neo-con's crap and spoke with their votes! Unlike the current victorious party's predecessors that stole the last two presidential elections.
2006-11-08 11:11:55
·
answer #8
·
answered by Truth Seeker 3
·
6⤊
2⤋
Why should there be a recount? We won fair and square. Recounts are for manipulated votes.
2006-11-08 11:17:21
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
4⤋
No they got the graveyard vote so they are happy
2006-11-08 11:35:32
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋