Other than a spurt of riots and clashes, it will not really change much of anything. There is already sectarian violence and it will not change with the outcome of the Saddam trial.
As far as the day to day life in Iraq right now, I dont believe it will change anything at all.
2006-11-08 02:23:39
·
answer #1
·
answered by artisticallyderanged 4
·
1⤊
0⤋
Not much. The Iraqis have too many urgent problems to deal with. Surviving till tomorrow, just to mention one. For 90% of them Saddam is already history, the real problem is what to do now.
All arab countries have the death penalty. It seems to suit their feelings of justice (an eye for an eye, and so on). For their sensibility, probably killing Saddam is the most obvious thing to do.
For us such a thing is unthinkable, a state that kills its citizens is no better than its criminals. But we don't live there... so, let them have Saddam's head if they want it.
2006-11-08 10:43:08
·
answer #2
·
answered by OrsonZ 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
In Short Civil War...
There will probably be ( if there isn't already ) , an extreme faction who support Saddam and will make him a martyr . Then there will be an other group with opposite views .. and so History repeats its self again in a different arena...
2006-11-08 02:29:39
·
answer #3
·
answered by plutoniccatgirl 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
Some people will now live that may of otherwise died.
Mind you, if Saddam Hussein hadn't been investigated, then some people would have lived that have since died.
2006-11-08 02:27:34
·
answer #4
·
answered by The Mole 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
I'm not normally in favour of the DP, but in this case, there may be an initial spate of extra violence, but if he were imprisoned, there's always the added danger that innocent civilians might be kidnapped and murdered in an attempt by his supporters to get him out.
2006-11-08 02:25:49
·
answer #5
·
answered by migdalski 7
·
1⤊
0⤋
None at all. The residents of Iraq will continue to kill each other in the name of Islam, only for an individual to attain power who will, in turn, exploit them. The ideological goals they originally were pursuing being forgotten and only secular greed and jealousy replaced in its stead. Power corrupts. Absolute power corrupts absolutely.
2006-11-08 02:37:54
·
answer #6
·
answered by AaronO 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
i do no longer desire to sound impolite or offensive or something like that, regardless of the shown fact that it type of sounds like a tragic end for Saddam. nevertheless i do no longer think murdering and torture is ethical or precise, I do have faith that Iraq would have been headed in a semi-precise way, whether it wasn't in the direction of democracy. i think of that that's ironic that we are able to at as quickly as criticize and ostracize people on the instant for such heinous crimes to an exceedingly severe degree, yet yet we don't do an identical for persons interior the previous. the final public of great countries did no longer grow to be useful by potential of being susceptible and passive, no they had to pass out, salary wars and do greater "undesirable stuff." The Juliues Ceasar did no longer earnings potential and land via potential of sitting in Rome, and Genghis Khan somewhat did no longer grow to be a historic parent by potential of driving on his horse on my own. regardless of the shown fact that i do no longer desire to justify Saddam's strikes, countries do exactly no longer grow to be something by potential of doing no longer something. there are various greater heinous people interior the previous who've achieved much greater undesirable issues, yet no person seems to share any sympathy for those. The Aztecs have been somewhat thoroughly wiped out by potential of the Spanish conquistadors, yet who's crying for them? i'm going to admit that Saddam did no longer manage his people and others with type and admire, and we actually can't make a real huge difference between what we interior the western society deem truthful and those residing under Saddam. there's a chinese language proverb that a frog residing in a nicely is conscious no longer something with regard to the international outdoors the nicely by using fact the frog can no longer even fathom approximately something it has in no way experienced itself previously. So gender roles would seem to place emphasis on men and much less potential for women, its their society and that's the way they have survived on, unfair because it could seem, in case you have been to take the frog outdoors the nicely, it would not comprehend what to do, comparable for the gender roles, the very stability and fabirc of their society will become untangled and could become chaotic. I digressed too lots, yet ingredient is, countries ought to undergo extreme variations with a view to grow to be useful, and Saddam grew to become into assisting Iraq, in greater of a selfish way, nevertheless who in potential isn't selfish?
2016-12-28 16:00:42
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
there will be ppl objectin to e hangin of saddam. but thinkin on e whole.. mani countries wished fer his death.
2006-11-08 02:30:27
·
answer #8
·
answered by sheryl8285 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
yes i think he should be executed for killing innocent people.
but so should blair and bush as they have killed a greater number of people.
The majority of Iraq would be happy as he killed innocent people. but some would be disheartened as blair and bush have done the similar things on a larger scale and its still going on today!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
2006-11-09 01:27:19
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
yes i think he should be executed for all the badness he has done.but i dont think it will change that much.but some plp can live better lives now
2006-11-08 09:52:28
·
answer #10
·
answered by sara b 1
·
0⤊
0⤋