If your side claimed that there would be massive fraud, and then you win, does this mean that you guys were the ones committing massive fraud to win?
2006-11-08
02:04:21
·
8 answers
·
asked by
Have gun, will travel.
4
in
Politics & Government
➔ Elections
Not accusing anyone, it was a rhetorical question. I notice only 1 person has actually gotten it. Goodluck to the rest.
2006-11-08
03:55:35 ·
update #1
exactly, grasshopper. They always do it, blaim someone else for what they themselves are guilty of doing. Sneaky Bastards.
2006-11-08 02:06:53
·
answer #1
·
answered by jasonzbtzl 4
·
2⤊
3⤋
Well, now the Republicans are claiming fraud. Interesting huh?
The democrats this year organized a huge bank of lawyers and volunteers to reduce fraud. Actually, most of the problems were with attempts at voter negation - trying to stop registered voters from casting a ballot.
I was working at the polls yesterday, and was thoroughly disgusted by one of the Republican-party appointed challengers. We started with a civilized discussion about how the day had gone, now that we have switched to a paper-trail system instead of electronic machines. She said 'people should understand that voting isn't a right, it's a privilege'. This was one of the most un-American things I've heard in a long time. A privilege is something arbitrarily granted which can be revoked - if this is the republican's position on voter rights, no wonder the Democrats are concerned for the integrity of the process.
Every American DOES have a right to vote.
2006-11-08 02:11:20
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
0⤋
I wondered the same thing, the dems will probably say that because "they were on to them" the republicans had to "settle" for "believeable" results. At least we won't have to hear about any "stolen" elections this time, despite a lot of close races, except maybe for those last few senate seats. I think it's because the news agencies condemning republicans every night, republicans forgetting why they were given both houses in 1994, and picking the wrong platform, illegal immigration and private property rights inititatives won easily, the republicans should have had the balls to embrace those ideals. AND keep the last pledge of the 1994 "Contract With America", TERM LIMITS, their failure to keep that pledge lead to their loss of power anyways, so now they have no choice but to replace the "old guard" anyways. I hope they learned their lesson.
2006-11-08 02:18:43
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
1⤋
That would mean that the republicans would have tampered to make the dems win. And no, I'm not much of a conspiracy theorist so I don't think that happened. It was just plain old time for the reps to go
2006-11-08 02:07:53
·
answer #4
·
answered by hichefheidi 6
·
2⤊
1⤋
It's the Democrat way! Blame your opponent for what you are doing and then declare that you won because you stopped it from happening.
2006-11-08 02:14:02
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
2⤋
Come on , give it up , take it like a man . OK ?
2006-11-08 02:10:11
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
0⤋
whatever it takes....btw if you can't beat em join em
then beat em
2006-11-08 02:08:39
·
answer #7
·
answered by Enigma 6
·
2⤊
0⤋
Begone, sore loser.
2006-11-08 02:11:43
·
answer #8
·
answered by Kacky 7
·
2⤊
1⤋